Questions, Feedback & Help
Send us an email and we'll get back to you ASAP. Or you can read our Frequently Asked Questions.
  • page settings
  • hide sidebar
  • show empty fields
  • layout
  • (too narrow)
  • open all
  • close all
Resources » Paper

Carmel L et al. (2009) Genome Biol Evol "A universal nonmonotonic relationship between gene compactness and expression levels in multicellular eukaryotes."

  • History

  • Referenced

  • Tree Display

  • My Favorites

  • My Library

  • Comments on Carmel L et al. (2009) Genome Biol Evol "A universal nonmonotonic relationship between gene compactness and expression levels in multicellular eukaryotes." (0)

  • Overview

    PMID:
    20333206
    DOI:
    10.1093/gbe/evp038
    Status:
    Publication type:
    Journal_article
    WormBase ID:
    WBPaper00036126

    Carmel L, & Koonin EV (2009). A universal nonmonotonic relationship between gene compactness and expression levels in multicellular eukaryotes. Genome Biol Evol, 1, 382-90. doi:10.1093/gbe/evp038

    Analysis of gene architecture and expression levels of four organisms, Homo sapiens, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Arabidopsis thaliana, reveals a surprising, nonmonotonic, universal relationship between expression level and gene compactness. With increasing expression level, the genes tend at first to become longer but, from a certain level of expression, they become more and more compact, resulting in an approximate bell-shaped dependence. There are two leading hypotheses to explain the compactness of highly expressed genes. The selection hypothesis predicts that gene compactness is predominantly driven by the level of expression, whereas the genomic design hypothesis predicts that expression breadth across tissues is the driving force. We observed the connection between gene expression breadth in humans and gene compactness to be significantly weaker than the connection between expression level and compactness, a result that is compatible with the selection hypothesis but not the genome design hypothesis. The initial gene elongation with increasing expression level could be explained, at least in part, by accumulation of regulatory elements enhancing expression, in particular, in introns. This explanation is compatible with the observed positive correlation between intron density and expression level of a gene. Conversely, the trend toward increasing compactness for highly expressed genes could be caused by selection for minimization of energy and time expenditure during transcription and splicing and for increased fidelity of transcription, splicing, and/or translation that is likely to be particularly critical for highly expressed genes. Regardless of the exact nature of the forces that shape the gene architecture, we present evidence that, at least, in animals, coding and noncoding parts of genes show similar architectonic trends.


    Tip: Seeing your name marked red? Please help us identify you.