-
[
Transcription,
2023]
Caenorhabditis elegans can enter a diapause stage called "dauer" when it senses that the environment is not suitable for development. This implies a detour from the typical developmental trajectory and requires a tight control of the developmental clock and a massive tissue remodeling. In the last decades, core components of the signaling pathways that govern the dauer development decision have been identified, but the tissues where they function for the acquisition of dauer-specific traits are still under intense study. Growing evidence demonstrates that these pathways engage in complex cross-talk and feedback loops. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the transcriptional regulation of the dauer program and the relevant tissues for its achievement. A better understanding of this process will provide insight on how developmental plasticity is achieved and how development decisions are under a robust regulation to ensure an all-or-nothing response. Furthermore, this developmental decision can also serve as a simplified model for relevant developmental disorders.Abbreviations: AID Auxin Induced Degron DA dafachronic acid Daf-c dauer formation constitutive Daf-d dauer formation defective DTC Distal Tip Cells ECM modified extracellular matrix GPCRs G protein-coupled receptors IIS insulin/IGF-1 signaling ILPs insulin-like peptides LBD Ligand Binding Domain PDL4 Post Dauer L4 TGF-β transforming growth factor beta WT wild-type.
-
[
WormBook,
2005]
The regulation of transcription in C. elegans shares many similarities to transcription in other organisms. The details of how specific transcription factors bind to target promoters and act as either activators or repressors are still being examined in many cases, but an increasing number of factors and their binding sites are being characterized. This chapter reviews the general concepts that have emerged with regards to promoter function in C. elegans. Included are the methods that have been successfully employed as well as limitations encountered to date. Specific cis-acting promoter elements from
myo-2 ,
hlh-1 and
lin-26 are discussed as examples of complex promoters regulated by multiple sequence elements. In addition, examples of organ-, tissue-, and cell type-specific mechanisms for generating spatial specificity in gene expression are discussed.
-
[
Methods Cell Biol,
1995]
The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans provides a convenient experimental entry point into many developmental processes and a powerful tool that can be exploited to characterize interactions among a set of genes regulating a particular pathway. Eventually, though, the study of developmental processes becomes a molecular study of gene regulation. At this level, the determination of the on/off state of a gene requires an understanding of not only its transcriptional state, but also post-transcriptional, translational, and post-translational control mechanisms. Although the vertebrate literature is rich in details of factors that influence these regulatory processes, relatively few of the factors responsible for gene expression in the nematode C. elegans have been characterized. This lag in knowledge reflects both the relatively recent arrival of C. elegans on the list of experimental systems, as well as its general unsuitability for biochemistry. There are no tissue culture cell lines established from C. elegans, and it is difficult to isolate, in large amounts, any homogeneous cell type. Moreover, the impermeable eggshell encasing the embryo and the cuticle encasing the worm make pharmacological studies in intact animals difficult and tedious. Grim as this sounds, progress has been made in C. elegans in the field of gene expression. The sensitivity of techniques has improved and the available molecular tool kit has expanded. The study of individual genes has provided descriptions of several regulatory processes, some general and some gene specific. Our current level of understanding of gene regulation is sufficient to say that C. elegans appears, in general, to be a typical eukaryote. As such, C. elegans is amenable to many of the standard analytical approaches used in other developmental systems. The purpose of this chapter is to review our current state of knowledge of transcription and translation in C. elegans (for a review
-
[
Bioessays,
1998]
Sometimes genes are arranged nonrandomly on the chromosomes of eukaryotes. This review considers instances of gene clusters in which two genes or more are expressed from a single promoter. This includes cases in which a polycistronic pre-mRNA is processed to make monocistronic mRNAs in nematodes, as well as isolated examples of polycistronic mRNAs found in mammals, flies, and perhaps plants.
-
[
WormBook,
2006]
Appropriate regulation of mRNA transcription is central to the differentiation and functions of eukaryotic cells, and to the development of complex organisms. mRNAs are synthesized by the coordinated action of a set of general transcription and mRNA modification factors. These factors and the fundamental mechanisms involved in transcription are conserved among eukaryotes, including C. elegans. Recent studies in various systems have revealed that this apparatus is not controlled through a simple on/off switch at the promoter, and that the factors and mechanisms involved in transcription are instead subject to regulation at a surprising number of different levels. In this chapter we will discuss examples in which regulation involving the general mRNA transcription apparatus or other transcription co-factors plays a central role in C. elegans development, and in which C. elegans studies have provided new insights into eukaryotic transcription mechanisms. Together, these studies have shown that regulatory mechanisms that involve the general Pol II machinery are a central participant in many aspects of C. elegans biology.
-
[
Methods Cell Biol,
1995]
This chapter is devoted to providing information on techniques applicable to studying transcription and translation in Caenorhabditis elegans. These techniques are constantly evolving and being passed among workers, each making improvements or adaptations. None of the techniques discussed below are original, but, rather, have emerged from a variety of sources over the years, making it difficult to trace their origin or give credit to the originators. Although each technique has been used successfully, for each there are alternative methods available in the literature that work equally well. In fact, depending on the available resources, you might find that an alternative technique suits your needs and facilities better than the one described below. For this reason, the procedures discussed below are usually accompanied by one or more references that will allow you to look at other, related methods. Where appropriate, there will also be a discussion of factors to consider when
-
[
Development,
2008]
In animals, the germline is the only lineage that transmits genetic information to the next generation. Although the founder cells of this lineage are specified differently in invertebrates and vertebrates, recent studies have shown that germline specification in C. elegans, Drosophila and mouse depends on the global inhibition of mRNA transcription. Different strategies are used in each organism, but remarkably most target the same two processes: transcriptional elongation and chromatin remodeling. This convergence suggests that a repressed genome is essential to preserve the unique developmental potential of the germline.
-
[
Biochimie,
2007]
Mediator is an essential component of the RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription machinery. This component plays a key role both in the stimulation of basal transcription and in the regulation of eukaryotic mRNA synthesis. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mediator complex was the first to be studied and consists of at least 20 different subunits with multiple activities. Afterwards, its subunit composition was determined and related functions of C. elegans, Drosophila and mammalian complexes show a striking evolutionary conservation both of the structure and function from yeast to man. Recently, yeast studies strongly suggest additional roles for Mediator in coordinating transcription initiation with downstream transcriptional events in the coding region of genes; consequently, new models of recruitment-coupled regulation have been indicated. Further studies on transcription machinery should expand our knowledge of the pathways in which variant components of Mediator, or variant proteins interacting directly or in complexes, represent risk factors for complex inheritable disease.
-
[
J Genet,
2018]
Dosage compensation is a regulatory system designed to equalize the transcription output of the genes of the sex chromosomes that are present in different doses in the sexes (X or Z chromosome, depending on the animal species involved). Different mechanisms of dosage compensation have evolved in different animal groups. In Drosophila males, a complex (male-specific lethal) associates with the X chromosome and enhances the activity of most X-linked genes by increasing the rate of RNAPII elongation. In Caenorhabditis, a complex (dosage compensation complex) that contains a number of proteins involved in condensing chromosomes decreases the level of transcription of both X chromosomes in the XX hermaphrodite. In mammals, dosage compensation is achieved by the inactivation, early during development, of most X-linked genes on one of the two X chromosomes in females. The mechanism involves the synthesis of an RNA (Tsix) that protects one of the two Xs from inactivation, and of another RNA (Xist) that coats the other X chromosome and recruits histone and DNA modifying enzymes. This review will focus on the current progress in understanding the dosage compensation mechanisms in the three taxa where it has been best studied at the molecular level: flies, round worms and mammals.
-
[
Trends Genet,
1995]
Caenorhabditis elegans engages in three distinct versions of nuclear pre-mRNA splicing: cis-splicing of introns and two kinds of trans-splicing that result in the addition of two different spliced leaders onto mRNAs. One leader (SL1) is used near the 5' ends of pre-mRNAs while the other (SL2) is used at internal trans-splice sites of polycistronic pre-mRNAs. Here, I consider bow these three types of splicing event are faithfully carried out.