C. elegans strains Bristol (N2) and Hawaii (CB4856) exhibit a paternal-effect-by-zygotic incompatibility involving two genes -
peel-1 and
zeel-1.
peel-1 and
zeel-1 interact like a toxin and an antidote:
peel-1 is a paternal-effect gene that induces developmental arrest in embryos that do not inherit the zygotically expressed gene
zeel-1.
peel-1 and
zeel-1 are located adjacent to one another in the Bristol genome, and Hawaii carries a deletion spanning both genes. We have cloned
peel-1 and
zeel-1 by transgenic complementation.
peel-1 encodes a predicted transmembrane protein with no homology to any gene in any species.
peel-1::gfp transcriptional fusions are expressed in spermatocytes, and immunostaining localizes PEEL-1 to the cell membrane of mature sperm. Embryos affected by the paternal-effect lethality arrest paralyzed at the two-fold stage, suggesting that PEEL-1 causes a defect in muscle development or function.
zeel-1 encodes a protein homologous to the substrate recognition subunit of an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Unlike most members of its family, ZEEL-1 contains a predicted transmembrane domain, and this transmembrane domain is required for the ability of
zeel-1 to rescue the paternal-effect lethality.
zeel-1::gfp translational fusions are expressed ubiquitously in the embryo, beginning approximately 4 hours post-fertilization and ending before hatching. The observation that
zeel-1 expression does not begin until mid-embryogenesis raises the possibility that sperm-supplied PEEL-1 persists for several hours after fertilization. The
zeel-1/peel-1 incompatibility is not specific to a cross between Bristol and Hawaii. We have genotyped a large panel of wild strains at the
zeel-1/peel-1 locus and found that approximately two thirds of strains carry
zeel-1 and
peel-1 (like Bristol), whereas the remaining strains carry a deletion of the genes (like Hawaii). The Bristol- and Hawaii-like haplotypes exhibit elevated sequence divergence, and the allele frequency spectrum at the locus is indicative of balancing selection. We propose that balancing selection acting on
zeel-1,
peel-1, or a tightly linked locus preserves both haplotypes in the population despite the lethality caused by their interaction.