[
Esquire,
1985]
In the end, it is attention to detail that makes all the difference. It's the center fielder's extra two steps to the left, the salesman's memory for names, the lover's phone call, the soldier's clean weapon. It is the thing that separates the men from the boys, and, very often, the living from the dead. Professional success depends on it, regardless of the field. But in big-time genetic research, attention to detail is more than just a good work habit, more than a necessary part of the routine. In big-time genetic research, attention to detail is the very meat and the god of science. It isn't something that's expected; it is simply the way of things. Those in the field, particularly those who lead the field, are slaves to detail. They labor in submerged mines of it, and haul great loads of it up from the bottom of an unseen ocean-the invisible sea of biological phenomena, upon which all living things float. Detail's rule over genetics is total and cruel. Months and even years of work have literally gone down the drain because of the most minor miscalculations. Indeed, perhaps the greatest discovery in the history of the discipline-the double-helix structure of DNA-might have been made by Linus Pauling instead of James D. Watson and Francis H. C. Crick. But Pauling's equations contained a simple mistake in undergraduate-level chemistry, a sin against detail that is now part of the legend. Each of the six scientists singled out here has made his mark by mastering his own particular set of