Figure 1. The extent of avoidance of and adaptation to 1-octanol depends on the method of exposure to the odorant: (A) Time to response to an eyelash hair dipped in 10% 1-octanol for wild type (WT),
kqt-2 knockout, and
unc-25 Amsh glia knock down. N = 60 each. (B) Same as in A but the nematodes were exposed to 10 μl of 10% 1-octanol contained in a
p10 pipette tip. N = 45 each. (C) The time to response to 10% 1-octanol on an eyelash hair was plotted against the order in which each nematode was tested within the same plate for WT,
kqt-2 knockout, and
unc-25 Amsh glia knock down. Each point represents an average of 4 animals. (D) Same as in C, but the nematodes were exposed to 10 μl of 10% 1-octanol contained in a
p10 pipette tip. Averages are from 4 animals each. (E and F) Same as in C and D, respectively, but using 30% 1-octanol. Each point represents the average of 4 animals. (G) Adaptation to repetitive exposures to 10% 1-octanol on an eyelash hair for WT,
kqt-2 knockout, and
unc-25 Amsh glia knock down. The time to response was determined following exposure of the same nematode to 1-octanol 5 consecutive times (# trials) with at least 30 seconds interval in between exposures. (H) The comparison of the time of response to 1-octanol in the first versus the fifth trials (data from G) are shown here for the same strains. N = 15, 14, and 15 for WT,
kqt-2 knockout, and
unc-25 Amsh glia knock down, respectively. Data are shown as individual data points and mean +/- SE in panels A, B, and H, and as mean +/- SE in panels C-G. Statistics were by ANOVA with Tukey correction, **** denotes p < 0.0001, ns stands for non-statistically significant.