Huang Y-J et al. (1994) Worm Breeder's Gazette "From Ascaris to C. elegans: A Way to Study Gene Structure and Function"

Tobler H, Huang Y-J, Mueller F

[Worm Breeder's Gazette, 1994]

FROM ASCARIS TO C. ELEGANS: A WAY TO STUDY GENE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION Huang Y-J., Tobler H. and Muller F., Institute of Zoology, University of Pribourg, Perolles, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland

Sophie Jarriault et al. (2007) International Worm Meeting "The Y to PDA cell identity change in C. elegans : an in vivo model to study cell plasticity."

Yannick Schwab, Iva Greenwald, Sophie JARRIAULT

[International Worm Meeting, 2007]

The question of trans-differentiation or how a commited cell can change its identity has important implications ranging from organ regeneration to cancer. The lineage of the nematode C. elegans has identified a few cells that change their fates as the worm develops (1, 2), but this interesting observation has never been studied further. We are interested in understanding the molecular events underlying the Y to PDA cell transformation in C. elegans. Y is an epithelial cell that is part of the rectum in young larvae. It subsequentely moves anteriorly and becomes PDA, a motor-neuron which has a characteristic axonal projection . We have developed a set of useful molecular markers that allow to track the Y to PDA transformation and characterised the steps involved in this process, which we timed precisely with respect to the development of the somatic gonad. We have characterised the epithelial features of the Y cell at the ultrastructural level by electron-microscopy and we have examined the expression of cell fate markers in both cells. In addition, we showed that Y''s identity change does not require genes known to affect the developmental timing in C. elegans and we found that cell fusion, a possible mechanism invoked for trans-differentiation in vertebrates, does not contribute to the Y to PDA transformation. Finally, we have examined the importance of cell to cell interactions for the Y to PDA transformation by cell ablation experiments and studies of mutants affecting it, and what makes the Y cell competent to change its identity. We believe that this system is a powerful model to study cell plasticity in vivo, and we will discuss the results of our findings at the meeting. 1. J. E. Sulston, H. R. Horvitz, Dev Biol 56, 110-56 (Mar, 1977). 2. J. E. Sulston, J. G. White, Dev Biol 78, 577-97 (Aug, 1980).

Perreault J et al. (2007) Mol Biol Evol "Ro-associated Y RNAs in metazoans: evolution and diversification."

Perreault J, Perreault JP, Boire G

[Mol Biol Evol, 2007]

The Y genes encode small non-coding RNAs whose functions remain elusive, whose numbers vary between species, and whose major property is to be bound by the Ro60 protein (or its ortholog in other species). To better understand the evolution of the Y gene family, we performed a homology search in 27 different genomes along with a structural search using Y RNA specific motifs. These searches confirmed that Y RNAs are well conserved in the animal kingdom and resulted in the detection of several new Y RNA genes, including the first Y RNAs in insects and a second Y RNA detected in Caenorhabditis elegans. Unexpectedly, Y5 genes were retrieved almost as frequently as Y1 and Y3 genes, and, consequently are not the result of a relatively recent apparition as is generally believed. Investigation of the organization of the Y genes demonstrated that the synteny was conserved among species. Interestingly, it revealed the presence of six putative "fossil" Y genes, all of which were Y4 and Y5 related. Sequence analysis led to inference of the ancestral sequences for all Y RNAs. In addition, the evolution of existing Y RNAs was deduced for many families, orders and classes. Moreover, a consensus sequence and secondary structure for each Y species was determined. Further evolutionary insight was obtained from the analysis of several thousand Y retropseudogenes among various species. Taken together, these results confirm the rich and diversified evolution history of Y RNAs.

Yamaguchi M et al. (2016) Biochim Biophys Acta "NF-Y in invertebrates."

Yoshida H, Ly LL, Yamaguchi M, Ali MS, Yoshioka Y

[Biochim Biophys Acta, 2016]

BothDrosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) are useful model organisms to study in vivo roles of NF-Y during development. Drosophila NF-Y (dNF-Y) consists of three subunits dNF-YA, dNF-YB and dNF-YC. In some tissues, dNF-YC-related protein Mes4 may replace dNF-YC in dNF-Y complex. Studies with eye imaginal disc-specific dNF-Y-knockdown flies revealed that dNF-Y positively regulates the sevenless gene encoding a receptor tyrosine kinase, a component of the ERK pathway and negatively regulates the Sensless gene encoding a transcription factor to ensure proper development of R7 photoreceptor cells together with proper R7 axon targeting. dNF-Y also controls the Drosophila Bcl-2 (debcl) to regulate apoptosis. In thorax development, dNF-Y is necessary for both proper Drosophila JNK (basket) expression and JNK signaling activity that is responsible for thorax development. Drosophila p53 gene was also identified as one of the dNF-Y target genes in this system. C. elegans contains two forms of NF-YA subunit, CeNF-YA1 and CeNF-YA2. C. elegans NF-Y (CeNF-Y) therefore consists of CeNF-YB, CeNF-YC and either CeNF-YA1 or CeNF-YA2. CeNF-Y negatively regulates expression of the Hox gene egl-5 (ortholog of Drosophila Abdominal-B) that is involved in tail patterning. CeNF-Y also negatively regulates expression of the tbx-2 gene that is essential for development of the pharyngeal muscles, specification of neural cell fate and adaptation in olfactory neurons. Negative regulation of the expression of egl-5 and tbx-2 by CeNF-Y provides new insight into the physiological meaning of negative regulation of gene expression by NF-Y during development. In addition, studies on NF-Y in platyhelminths are also summarized.

Burns RG (1996) Trends in Cell Biology "Reply: Defining the gamma-, delta- and epsilon-tubulins."

Burns RG

[Trends in Cell Biology, 1996]

Keeling and Logsdon propose that the y-like sequences from Caenorhabditis elegans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are bona fide y-tubulins that have undergone rapid evolutionary divergence. Indeed, genetic and localization studies with the yeast epsilon-tubulin (encoded by the TUB4 gene) reveal striking similarities to the bona fide y-tubulins, whereas there is no apparent human analogue to the C. elegans delta-tubulin among the 60 available human y-tubulin expressed-sequence tags. (ESTs).

Gardiner TJ et al. (2009) RNA "A conserved motif of vertebrate Y RNAs essential for chromosomal DNA replication."

Langley AR, Gardiner TJ, Krude T, Christov CP

[RNA, 2009]

Noncoding Y RNAs are required for the reconstitution of chromosomal DNA replication in late G1 phase template nuclei in a human cell-free system. Y RNA genes are present in all vertebrates and in some isolated nonvertebrates, but the conservation of Y RNA function and key determinants for its function are unknown. Here, we identify a determinant of Y RNA function in DNA replication, which is conserved throughout vertebrate evolution. Vertebrate Y RNAs are able to reconstitute chromosomal DNA replication in the human cell-free DNA replication system, but nonvertebrate Y RNAs are not. A conserved nucleotide sequence motif in the double-stranded stem of vertebrate Y RNAs correlates with Y RNA function. A functional screen of human Y1 RNA mutants identified this conserved motif as an essential determinant for reconstituting DNA replication in vitro. Double-stranded RNA oligonucleotides comprising this RNA motif are sufficient to reconstitute DNA replication, but corresponding DNA or random sequence RNA oligonucleotides are not. In intact cells, wild-type hY1 or the conserved RNA duplex can rescue an inhibition of DNA replication after RNA interference against hY3 RNA. Therefore, we have identified a new RNA motif that is conserved in vertebrate Y RNA evolution, and essential and sufficient for Y RNA function in human chromosomal DNA replication.

Erickson DL et al. (2006) J Bacteriol "Serotype differences and lack of biofilm formation characterize Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection of the Xenopsylla cheopis flea vector of Yersinia pestis."

Hinnebusch BJ, Erickson DL, Wren BW, Jarrett CO

[J Bacteriol, 2006]

Yersinia pestis, the agent of plague, is usually transmitted by fleas. To produce a transmissible infection, Y. pestis colonizes the flea midgut and forms a biofilm in the proventricular valve, which blocks normal blood feeding. The enteropathogen Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, from which Y. pestis recently evolved, is not transmitted by fleas. However, both Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis form biofilms that adhere to the external mouthparts and block feeding of Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes, which has been proposed as a model of Y. pestis-flea interactions. We compared the ability of Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis to infect the rat flea Xenopsylla cheopis and to produce biofilms in the flea and in vitro. Five of 18 Y. pseudotuberculosis strains, encompassing seven serotypes, including all three serotype O3 strains tested, were unable to stably colonize the flea midgut. The other strains persisted in the flea midgut for 4 weeks but did not increase in numbers, and none of the 18 strains colonized the proventriculus or produced a biofilm in the flea. Y. pseudotuberculosis strains also varied greatly in their ability to produce biofilms in vitro, but there was no correlation between biofilm phenotype in vitro or on the surface of C. elegans and the ability to colonize or block fleas. Our results support a model in which a genetic change in the Y. pseudotuberculosis progenitor of Y. pestis extended its pre-existing ex vivo biofilm-forming ability to the flea gut environment, thus enabling proventricular blockage and efficient flea-borne transmission.

Sato, Manami et al. (2015) International Worm Meeting "Expression pattern of C. elegans Y RNA homologs."

Ushida, Chisato, Kihara, Shinya, Sato, Manami

[International Worm Meeting, 2015]

Y RNA is a small structured ncRNA of about 100 nt in length. This RNA binds to Ro60 protein, which is a target of autoimmune disease antibody in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjogren's syndrome. Several lines of evidence suggest that the role of Y RNA and Ro60 function in the quality control of structured ncRNAs in cells under stress conditions. It is also indicated that vertebrate Y RNAs function in the initiation of DNA replication without Ro60. However, the molecular mechanisms of these functions and the contribution of Ro60/Y RNP to the autoimmune disease are still unclear. C. elegans genome encodes one Ro60 homolog (ROP-1) and 19 Y RNA homologs (1 CeY RNA and 18 sbRNAs). Other animals also have several Y RNA homologs, but C. elegans is the first example which has more than 5 Y RNA homologs encoded in the genome. Here we show the expression pattern and the cellular localization of these Y RNA homologs in C. elegans examined by the RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH). The signals of 14 homologs were detected in the intestinal cytoplasm. The signals of two other homologs were detected in the germ cytoplasm. The remaining three could not be detected, probably because they present in too low abundance to be detected by RNA-FISH. All 19 Y RNA homologs have the structural elements required for the binding of ROP-1. In other organisms, Ro60 binding stabilizes Y RNAs in cells. To know whether C. elegans Y RNA homologs also stabilized by the presence of ROP-1, we examined RNA-FISH of the Y RNA homologs against a mutant strain MQ470, which has a transposon insertion in the middle of the ROP-1 gene and lacks ROP-1 proteins in the cell. As expected, all Y RNAs examined so far decreased extensively. These were confirmed by northern hybridization. The results suggest that several C. elegans Y RNA homologs are expressed in a tissue-specific manner and most Y RNA homologs are stabilized by ROP-1 binding as well as those in other organisms.

Zhou D et al. (2011) Protein Cell "Formation and regulation of Yersinia biofilms."

Yang R, Zhou D

[Protein Cell, 2011]

Flea-borne transmission is a recent evolutionary adaptation that distinguishes the deadly Yersinia pestis from its progenitor Y. Pseudotuberculosis, a mild pathogen transmitted via the food-borne route. Y. Pestis synthesizes biofilms in the flea gut, which is important for fleaborne transmission. Yersinia biofilms are bacterial colonies surrounded by extracellular matrix primarily containing a homopolymer of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine that are synthesized by a set of specific enzymes. Yersinia biofilm production is tightly regulated at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. All the known structural genes responsible for biofilm production are harbored in both Y. Pseudotuberculosis and Y. Pestis, but Y. Pestis has evolved changes in the regulation of biofilm development, thereby acquiring efficient arthropod-borne transmission.

Georgieva S et al. (2001) Mol Cell Biol "The novel transcription factor e(y)2 interacts with TAF(II)40 and potentiates transcription activation on chromatin templates."

Soldatov A, Georgieva S, Eickhoff H, Tora L, Becker P, Dilworth FJ, Georgiev P, Nabirochkina E

[Mol Cell Biol, 2001]

Weak hypomorph mutations in the enhancer of yellow genes, e(y)1 and e(y)2, of Drosophila melanogaster were discovered during the search for genes involved in the organization of interaction between enhancers and promoters. Previously, the e(y)1 gene was cloned and found to encode TAF(II)40 protein. Here we cloned the e(y)2 gene and demonstrated that it encoded a new ubiquitous evolutionarily conserved transcription factor. The e(y)2 gene is located at 10C3 (36.67) region and is expressed at all stages of Drosophila development. It encodes a 101-amino-acid protein, e(y)2. Vertebrates, insects, protozoa, and plants have proteins which demonstrate a high degree of homology to e(y)2. The e(y)2 protein is localized exclusively to the nuclei and is associated with numerous sites along the entire length of the salivary gland polytene chromosomes. Both genetic and biochemical experiments demonstrate an interaction between e(y)2 and TAF(II)40, while immunoprecipitation studies demonstrate that the major complex, including both proteins, appears to be distinct from TFIID. Furthermore, we provide genetic evidence suggesting that the carboxy terminus of dTAF(II)40 is important for mediating this interaction. Finally, using an in vitro transcription system, we demonstrate that recombinant e(y)2 is able to enhance transactivation by GAL4-VP16 on chromatin but not on naked DNA templates, suggesting that this novel protein is involved in the regulation of transcription.