Lifespan in C. elegans is influenced by several genetic pathways and processes. The DAF-2 insulin/IGF-1 pathway, the reproductive system, food intake, and mitochondrial activity (1, 2, 3) have all been shown to regulate aging: lifespan extensions of 15 to 600% occur in animals defect in one or more of these processes (1, 4, 5). The FOXO-family transcription factor DAF-16 is required for the lifespan extension observed in
daf-2 mutants, as well as in animals lacking a germline (1). However,
daf-16 is not required for the lifespan extension induced by perturbations of mitochondrial activities (2, 3) or by caloric restriction (5, 6). Most of our knowledge about the regulation of aging comes from mutants originally isolated because of other phenotypes. To ask whether our current view of aging has been affected by selection bias, and to deepen our understanding of known pathways, we screened a C. elegans RNAi feeding library (7) for clones that extend lifespan. In addition to known lifespan genes, we identified 23 new genes whose wild-type function is required to prevent lifespan extension (8). Reducing the function of these loci extended mean lifespan 15-80%. The 23 new longevity genes affect signal transduction, the stress response, gene expression, and metabolism. Using phenotypic and epistasis analysis, we have assigned many of these genes to known longevity pathways. Our most important findings are (i) that caloric restriction extends C. elegans lifespan by down-regulating expression of several genes, including a gene required for methylation of macromolecules, (ii) that integrin signaling is likely to play a general, evolutionarily-conserved role in lifespan regulation, and (iii) that specific lipophilic hormones may influence lifespan in a DAF-16/FOXO-dependent fashion. Surprisingly, of the new genes that have conserved sequence domains, only one could not be associated with a known longevity pathway. Thus, our current view of the genetics of aging has probably not been distorted substantially by selection bias. We expect the further study of these genes to provide valuable information about the mechanisms of aging. (1) Tatar et al., Science, 2003 (2) Dillin et al., Science, 2002 (3) Lee et al., Nature Genetics, 2002 (4) Arantes-Oliveira et al., Science, 2003 (5) Houthoofd et al., Exp Geron, 2003 (6) Lakowski and Hekimi, PNAS, 1998 (7) Kamath et al., Nature, 2003 (8) Hansen et al., manuscript (*Hansen and Hsu contributed equally to this work)