We are studying an apparent silencing phenomenon associated with tandemly arrayed repetitive sequences in C. elegans. Inactivation of repeated genes appears to be a widespread occurrence in a variety of eukaryotes. In Drosophila, genes repeated and/or juxtaposed to heterochromatin are frequently inactivated (1, 2), a phenomenon known as positioneffect variegation. In plants, silencing interactions between duplicated genes, otherwise known as repeatinduced gene silencing, are also commonly observed (3, 4). In a previous worm breeders' gazette (5), our lab reported that certain expression constructs are silenced when introduced into the animal as extrachromosomal tandem arrays of plasmid sequences; silencing is relieved by introduction of the transgene in a nonrepetitive context. We observe silencing in both some and gennline. Germline expression of the gene
let858 is particularly sensitive to the effect, but we also observed silencing of certain constructs that are otherwise active in the some (5). In order to examine the mechanisms recognizing and acting on tandemly repeated sequences in C. efegans, we would like to isolate mutants that affect the apparent gene silencing. We are using a plasmid construct (pPD98.41) in which a gfp reporter is driven by a combination of the
unc-54 enhancer and
myo-2 promoter. In nonrepetitive situations (either F1 assays or lines in which the transgene is present in a nonrepetitive context) we see expression of the construct in both body wall and pharyugeal muscle. From a tandem array of pPD98.41 mixed with the
rol6 marker plasmid pRF4, we see only expression in the pharynx. We interpret this as indicating that the ability of the
unc-54 enhancer to activate the
myo-2 promoter is silenced in repeated sequence contexts. Our general scheme is to mutagenize lines carrying these tandem arrays and then to look in subsequent generations for animals in u hich the transgene is no longer silenced. We are using a nonclonal approach to screen for viable mutations and a clonal approach to recover potentially lethal or sterile mutations. In preliminary screens, we have begun to recover animals that exhibit increased bodywall muscle expression of file transgene. Lines derived from such animals will he characterized to determine whether changes have occurred in the array, in muscle gene regulation, or in the silencing process. In a parallel set of experiments, we have been addressing the question of whether the extrachromosomal nature of arrays is involved in silencing. We are using gamma-irradiation to integrate the arrays described above. In the first integrants obtained, we have not observed any effect of the integration on the ability of the array to be silenced. 1 Spofford, J.B. (1976), Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Volume lc: 9551019; 2 Henikoff, S., Dorer, D.R. (1994), Cell 77: 9931002; 3 Matzke, M.A., Matzke, A.J.M., and Mittelsten Scheid, O. (1994), Homologous Recombination in Plants 271307; 4 Assaad, F.F., Tucker, K.L., and Signer, E.R. (1993), Plant Molecules Biology 22: 1067lO85; 5 Kelly, B., Xu, S., Fire, A. (1995), Worm Breeders Gazette, 14(1): 6465