The behavior of C. elegans consists of four simple locomotory events, forward, backward, turn by deep bending and rest (Ref.1). Worms combine these four locomotions appropriately to achieve their complex behaviors. C. elegans can avoid acidic pH less than 4.0 (Ref.2). Behavioral analysis of single worms, by using automatic worm tracking system, revealed that worms showed two kinds of avoidance responses during the acid avoidance behavior. 1) Stereotypic stop-back-turn-forward sequence was elicited when worms encountered into acidic region of pH gradient formed on agar plate (back avoidance), and 2) worms avoid acidic region by biased body bending superimposed on continuous forward movement (turn avoidance). Interestingly, choices between these two avoidance responses are not random. When worms encountered into the border of acidic region in a large angle (at around 90?), they chose back avoidance, and when they encountered in a small angle (less than 20?), they chose turn avoidance. Moreover, turn avoidance occurred at more neutral region than back avoidance. These results suggest that worms can recognize the difference between these two sensory contexts and make a decision how to avoid acidic region. Four chemosensory neurons (ASE, ADF, ASH and ASK) were known to be required for the acid avoidance behavior in C. elegans (Ref. 2).
eat-4 gene encodes a vesicular glutamate transporter expressed in neurons including ASH and ASK, and is required for the function of these neurons (Ref. 3).
eat-4(
ky5) mutant showed reduced back avoidance and the defect is partially rescued by expressing wild-type
eat-4 in ASK neurons. In contrast,
egl-3(
n150) and
egl-3(
n729) showed slightly increased back avoidance. EGL-3 is a proprotein convertase thought to downregulate the glutamate release in ASH (Ref. 4). Taken together, diminished glutamatergic transmission reduces back avoidance and enhanced glutamatergic signaling accelerates back avoidance, suggesting the role of glutamatergic pathway in the behavioral decision during acid avoidance. (Ref. 1) Croll (1975) J. Zool. 176: 159-176. (Ref. 2) Sambongi et al. (2000) Neuroreport 11: 2229-2232. (Ref. 3) Lee at al. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19: 159-167. (Ref. 4) Kass et al. (2001) J. Neurosci. 21: 9265-9272.