[
2005]
RNA interference (RNAi) is a recently discovered phenomenon in which doublestranded RNA (dsRNA) silences endogenous gene expression in a sequencespecific manner (Fire et al., 1998). Since its discovery, the use of RNAi has become widely employed in many organisms to specifically knock down gene function. RNAi shares a remarkable degree of similarity with silencing phenomena in other organisms (Cogoni et al., 1999a; Sharp, 1999). For instance, RNAi, posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants and cosuppression in fungi can all be activated by the presence of aberrant RNAs (Maine, 2000; Tijsterman et al., 2002a). Additionally, plant, worm, and fly cells or extracts undergoing RNA-mediated interference all contain small dsRNAs, around 25 nucleotides in length, identical to the sequences present in the silenced gene (Baulcombe, 1996; Hammond et al., 2000; Zamore et al., 2000; Catalanotto et al., 2000). The high degree of similarity between these RNA-mediated silencing phenomena supports the notion that they were derived from an ancient and conserved pathway used to regulate gene expression, presumably to eliminate defective RNAs and to defend against viral infections and transposons. (Zamore, 2002). Components of RNAi have also been implicated in developmental processes, suggesting that RNAi may play a broader role in regulating gene expression (Smardon et al., 2000; Knight et al., 2001; et al., Ketting et al., 2001). Although we have learned much about the general mechanisms underlying RNAi, a detailed understanding of how RNAi works remains to be elucidated. In this chapter we will discuss first the biology of RNAi, then the genes required for its function, and we will end with a discussion on recent findings that have implicated chromatin silencing in the mechanism of RNAi.
[
WormBook,
2005]
Cell-division control affects many aspects of development. Caenorhabditis elegans cell-cycle genes have been identified over the past decade, including at least two distinct Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDKs), their cyclin partners, positive and negative regulators, and downstream targets. The balance between CDK activation and inactivation determines whether cells proceed through G 1 into S phase, and from G 2 to M, through regulatory mechanisms that are conserved in more complex eukaryotes. The challenge is to expand our understanding of the basic cell cycle into a comprehensive regulatory network that incorporates environmental factors and coordinates cell division with growth, differentiation and tissue formation during development. Results from several studies indicate a critical role for CKI-1 , a CDK inhibitor of the Cip/Kip family, in the temporal control of cell division, potentially acting downstream of heterochronic genes and dauer regulatory pathways.
[
WormBook,
2006]
There are two sexes in C. elegans, hermaphrodite and male. While there are many sex-specific differences between males and hermaphrodites that affect most tissues, the basic body plan and many of its structures are identical. However, most structures required for mating or reproduction are sexually dimorphic and are generated by sex-specific cell lineages. Thus to understand cell fate specification in hermaphrodites, one must consider how the body plan, which is specified during embryogenesis, influences the fates individual cells. One possible mechanism may involve the asymmetric distribution of POP-1 /Tcf, the sole C. elegans Tcf homolog, to anterior-posterior sister cells. Another mechanism that functions to specify cell fates along the anterior-posterior body axis in both hermaphrodites and males are the Hox genes. Since most of the cell fate specifications that occur in hermaphrodites also occur in males, the focus of this chapter will be on those that only occur in hermaphrodites. This will include the cell fate decisions that affect the HSN neurons, ventral hypodermal P cells, lateral hypodermal cells V5 , V6 , and T ; as well as the mesodermal M, Z1 , and Z4 cells and the intestinal cells. Both cell lineage-based and cell-signaling mechanisms of cell fate specification will be discussed. Only two direct targets of the sex determination pathway that influence cell fate specification to produce hermaphrodite-specific cell fates have been identified. Thus a major challenge will be to learn additional mechanisms by which the sex determination pathway interacts with signaling pathways and other cell fate specification genes to generate hermaphrodite-specific cell fates.