A key risk factor in alcoholism is the genetic predisposition for high alcohol tolerance. Tolerance, as defined in DSM-IV, refers to a "diminished effect with continued use of the same amount of alcohol". However, the mechanisms underlying alcohol tolerance are poorly understood. Studies of postmortem human alcoholic brains suggested that alcoholism is associated with epigenetic driven gene expression changes that involve methylation of histones lysine residues via histone methyltransferases (HMTs). Two complexes that methylate H3 histone lysine residue 4 (H3K4) and residue 9 (H3K9) are of particular interest because H3K4 methylation is often associated with H3K9 demethylation, and vice versa. H3K4 methylation is associated with active transcription and H3K9 methylation is associated with repressed transcription, suggesting an antagonistic gene activation/repression mechanism. To determine whether H3K4/H3K9 HMTs in C. elegans play a role in alcohol tolerance, we developed a behavioral model of tolerance in C. elegans based on the DSM-IV definition, then characterized the tolerance phenotypes of the H3K4 HMT mutant,
set-2, and H3K9 HMTs mutant,
set-11. To develop a tolerance model, we pre-exposed worms to 0mM, 200mM, and 400mM ethanol in agar for 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hrs in Day 1 or Day 2 adult worms cultured at 20oC, and examined locomotor movement of the worms on 0mM, 200mM or 400mM ethanol the next day using Multi-Worm Tracker. We found that wild type worms that were pre-exposed to 200mM ethanol for 24 hours, allowed to recover off alcohol for 2 hours, and then exposed again to 200mM ethanol showed diminished effect of alcohol on locomotor speed compared to that of worms pre-exposed to 0mM ethanol and then exposed to 200mM the next day. This suggests worms exposed to alcohol the 2nd time showed a behavioral tolerance to ethanol. On the other hand, worms in the withdrawal group (pre-exposed to 200mM and exposed to 0mM the next day) moved at the same speed as worms in the naive group (pre-exposed to 0mM and exposed to 0mM the next day), suggesting that pre-exposure did not affect locomotor speed. Using this tolerance model, we evaluated the effect of tolerance in
set-2 and
set-11 mutants, and found that neither mutant showed tolerance to ethanol. Second-exposure
set-2 and
set-11 mutant groups moved at the same speed as the first-time exposure groups, suggesting that the first exposure did not produce tolerance as it did in WT worms. In addition, mutant withdrawal groups moved at the same speed as naive groups, suggesting
set-2 and
set-11 do not play a role in withdrawal. Together our results suggest that H3K4/H3K9 HMTs might play a critical role in the development of alcohol tolerance.