T-box (Tbx) transcription factors comprise an evolutionarily conserved family of proteins involved in specifying tissue identity during embryonic development. Members of the Tbx2 subfamily function primarily as transcriptional repressors and regulate multiple events during cardiac and limb development in vertebrates. In C.elegans,
tbx-2 functions in pharyngeal development, olfactory adaptation and male ray assembly. It is most closely related to the human TBX3 and mouse Tbx2. Haplo-insufficiency of TBX3 leads to ulnar-mammary syndrome, affecting limb, apocrine gland, tooth, heart and genital development. We identified a
tbx-2 allele in a screen for mutants with defects in the development of HSN neurons. This allele carries a missense mutation in the T-box DNA binding sequence and behaves similarly to the deletion allele
tbx-2(
ok529). The HSN neurons often fail to migrate properly and are occasionally missing. The sister cell PHB also appears to be occasionally missing. We find that a mutation in the apoptotic gene
ced-3 specifically rescues the missing PHB, suggesting that the PHBs die in the
tbx-2 mutants. HAM-1 is a novel protein that regulates the asymmetric division of the neuroblast which generates the HSN/PHB precursor, and
ham-1 mutants are also occasionally missing HSN and PHB neurons. While mutations in either
ham-1 or
ttbx-2 result in the partial loss of HSN and PHB neurons, the double mutants have very few HSN or PHB neurons. These observations indicate that HAM-1 and TBX-2 act in parallel to specify the fates of the HSN and PHB neurons. We are currently asking three questions. First, are the HSN and PHB neurons in the
tbx-2;
ham-1 double mutants dying? Second, does
tbx-2 directly regulate genes of the apoptotic pathway? Third, does TBX-2 function cell-autonomously in the HSN/PHB lineage? If so, does it act in the HSN and PHB neurons or does it function in their progenitors?