-
[
International C. elegans Meeting,
1995]
Dirofilaria immitis, the causative agent of dog heartworm disease, is a model system for the study of filarial parasites. Filariasis afflicts over 300 million people worldwide, causing serious and debilitating disease. Knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in parasite development will facilitate the design of therapeutic agents. Nematodes such as D. immitis undergo a series of larval molts before becoming sexually mature adults. The steroid hormone ecdysone is present in D. immitis and is capable of stimulating molting in the parasite in vitro. This suggests that ecdysone has a role in regulating molting and possibly other developmental processes in filaria. In order to understand these processes, we have identified a D. immitis ecdysone receptor (EcR) homolog, dinhr-3, by PCR using degenerate primers derived from the sequence of the DNA binding domain of the Drosophila EcR. The dinhr-3 cDNA, compared with the Drosophila EcR, shows 79% amino acid identity in the DNA binding domain and 59% amino acid identity over the E1, E2, and E3 regions of the hormone binding domain. In Drosophila, EcR heterodimerizes with ultraspiracle (Usp), an RXR family member. A putative Usp homolog from D. immitis, dinhr-4, has also been identified showing 81% identity in the DNA binding domain and 52% over the E1, E2, and E3 regions of the hormone binding domain. The biochemistry and developmental regulation of these NHR's are being investigated. In addition we have isolated several other NHR's from D. immitis and C. elegans some showing significant sequence similarity with specific members of the NHR superfamily (see abstract by Sluder et. al.). Further molecular characterization of dinhr-3, dinhr-4,and the other NHR's is currently underway. Identifying genes which are regulated by the EcR and exploring their roles in parasite development will allow the development of strategies to combat filariasis.
-
[
International C. elegans Meeting,
1995]
To date 24 C. elegans genes encoding members of the nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) superfamily of transcription factors have been identified, primarily by our direct homology screens and by the genome sequencing project. Most of these genes encode widely divergent members of the NHR superfamily. While all exhibit significant sequence similarity in the highly conserved DNA-binding domain, many (13/24) have unique amino acid sequences in the region responsible for DNA binding site recognition, suggesting that the DNA binding specificities of these C. elegans proteins will differ from those of previously characterized NHRs. All of the C. elegans NHRs are "orphan" receptors for which the ligands, if any, are unknown. Though not as highly conserved as the DNA-binding domains, blocks of sequence similarity are found in the ligand-binding domains of all NHRs known to bind ligands. These regions of similarity are also seen in many, but not all, orphan receptors, including at least 10 of the C. elegans NHRs. Five NHR genes have also been identified in the dog heartworm Dirofilaria immitis. One of these, dinhr-2, is closely related to the C. elegans gene
nhr-6. Two others exhibit significant homology to the two genes encoding subunits of the Drosophila ecdysone receptor (see abstract by Shea et al.). As little is known about the biological roles of most of the C. elegans NHR genes we are undertaking genetic analysis of a selected subset. Tc1 insertions have been generated in
nhr-6 and in the embryonically expressed
nhr-2; deletion screens are underway. Progress in these and other screens will be presented.
-
[
International Worm Meeting,
2007]
The retinoic acid X receptors (RXRs) are considered to be an ancient group of nuclear receptors and have been identified in a variety of metazoans, including nematodes. However, the presence of RXR homologs in nematodes has only been confirmed in filarial parasites (Shea et al, 2004). In insects, the RXR homolog USP interacts with the EcR nuclear receptor to function as the holoreceptor for the molting hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone. Neither RXR nor EcR nuclear receptor homologs are encoded in the C. elegans and C. briggsae genomes, even though many of the nuclear receptors that function downstream of USP/EcR in insects are found in C. elegans and function to regulate the nematode molting process (Gissendanner et al, 2004). Therefore, an interesting question is whether RXR, and EcR, are found in other, non-parasitic nematodes. A search of genome sequences from the free-living nematode Pristionchus pacificus identified a genomic fragment encoding a potential RXR nuclear receptor. This fragment was used to design RT-PCR experiments to isolate cDNAs encoding this putative RXR nuclear receptor. We have successfully isolated several full-length cDNAs corresponding to the genomic sequence, and these cDNAs encode a nuclear receptor with significant similarity to RXR nuclear receptors (>80% in the DNA binding domain). Several mRNA isoforms have been isolated. Temporal expression profiles using semi-quantitative RT-PCR indicate expression fluctuations that correlate with the molting cycle, suggesting a role for the Pristionchus pacificus RXR during molting. We are currently further testing this hypothesis using Northern analysis and RNA interference. The isolation of an RXR nuclear receptor from a free-living nematode provides an opportunity to investigate the biological functions and evolution of RXR in nematodes.
-
[
West Coast Worm Meeting,
2002]
To understand the evolution of developmental mechanisms, we are doing a comparative analysis of vulval patterning in C. elegans and C. briggsae. C. briggsae is closely related to C. elegans and has identical looking vulval morphology. However, recent studies have indicated subtle differences in the underlying mechanisms of development. The recent completion of C. briggsae genome sequence by the C. elegans Sequencing Consortium is extremely valuable in identifying the conserved genes between C. elegans and C. briggsae.
-
[
International Worm Meeting,
2019]
C. inopinata is a newly discovered sibling species of C. elegans. Despite their phylogenetic closeness, they have many differences in morphology and ecology. For example, while C. elegans is hermaphroditic, C. inopinata is gonochoristic; C. inopinata is nearly twice as long as C. elegans. A comparative analysis of C. elegans and C. inopinata enables us to study how genomic changes cause these phenotypic differences. In this study, we focused on early embryogenesis of C. inopinata. First, by the microparticle bombardment method we made a C. inopinata line that express GFP::histone in whole body, and compared the early embryogenesis with C. elegans by DIC and fluorescent live imaging. We found that the position of pronuclei and polar bodies were different between these two species. In C. elegans, the female and male pronuclei first become visible in anterior and posterior sides, respectively, then they meet at the center of embryo. On the other hand, the initial position of pronuclei were more closely located in C. inopinata. Also, the polar bodies usually appear in the anterior side of embryo in C. elegans, but they appeared at random positions in C. inopinata. Therefore, we infer that C. inopinata may have a different polarity formation mechanism from that in C. elegans. We are also analyzing temperature dependency of embryogenesis in C. inopinata, whose optimal temperature is ~7 degree higher than that in C. elegans.
-
[
Development & Evolution Meeting,
2008]
Recently, seven new Caenorhabditis have been discovered, bringing the number of Caenorhabditis species in culture to 17, 10 of which are undescribed. To elucidate the relationships of the new species to the five species with sequenced genomes, we have used sequence data from two rRNA genes and several protein-coding genes for reconstructing the phylogenetic tree of Caenorhabditis. Four new species (spp. 5, 9, 10, 11) group within the so-called Elegans group of Caenorhabditis, with C. elegans being the first branch. Whereas none of them is likely to be the sister species of C. elegans, we now know of two close relatives of C. briggsae-C. sp. 5 and C. sp. 9. C. sp. 9 can hybridize with C. briggsae in the laboratory [see abstract by Woodruff et al.]. Of the remaining new species, C. sp. 7 branches off between C. elegans and C. japonica. This species is easier to cultivate than C. japonica and may be a better candidate for comparative experimental work. Two of the new species branch off before C. japonica as sister species of C. sp. 3 and C. drosophilae+C. sp. 2, respectively. Only one of the new species, C. sp. 11, is hermaphroditic. The position of C. sp. 11 in the phylogeny suggests that hermaphroditism evolved three times within the Elegans group. Two of the new species were isolated from rotting leaves and flowers, and five from rotting fruit. Rotting fruit is also the habitat in which C. elegans has been found to proliferate (Barriere and Felix, Genetics 2007) and from which C. briggsae, C. brenneri and C. remanei were repeatedly isolated. This suggests that the habitat of the stem species of Caenorhabditis after the divergence of the earliest branches (C. plicata, C. sonorae and C. sp. 1) was rotting fruit. The rate of discovery of new Caenorhabditis species has steadily increased since the description of C. elegans in 1899, with a leap in the last two years. There is no indication that we are even close to knowing all species in this genus.
-
[
International Worm Meeting,
2015]
Dosage compensation (DC) across Caenorhabditis species exemplifies an essential process that has undergone rapid co-evolution of protein-DNA interactions central to its mechanism. In C. elegans, recruitment elements on X (rex sites) recruit a condensin-like DC complex (DCC) to hermaphrodite X chromosomes to balance gene expression between the sexes. Recruitment assays in vivo showed that C. elegans rex sites do not recruit the DCC of C. briggsae, and vice versa. To understand how DC complexes and X chromosomes evolved to use different X targeting sequences, we compared DCC subunits and binding sites in C. elegans to those in three species of the C. briggsae clade (15-30 MYR diverged): C. briggsae, its close relative C. nigoni (C. sp. 9), and C. tropicalis (C. sp. 11). By raising antibodies and introducing endogenous tags with TALENs or CRISPR/Cas9, we showed that homologs of both SDC-2, the pivotal X targeting factor, and DPY-27, a DCC-specific condensin subunit, bind X chromosomes of XX animals. Although the DCC shares key components across these four species, the binding sites differ. First, ChIP-seq studies in C. briggsae and C. nigoni identified DCC binding sites that are homologous across these close relatives but differ from C. elegans sites in sequence and location. Second, C. elegans sites use motifs enriched on X (MEX and MEXII) to drive DCC binding, but these motifs are not in C. briggsae or C. nigoni DCC sites and are not X-enriched. Third, we found an X-enriched motif at DCC binding sites of C. briggsae and C. nigoni that is not X-enriched in C. elegans. An oligo with the C. briggsae motif recruits the DCC in C. briggsae, but a similar oligo lacking the motif fails to recruit, establishing the importance of the motif. Fourth, another motif was found in C. briggsae and C. nigoni that shares a few nucleotides with MEX, but its functional divergence was shown by C. elegans recruitment assays. Fifth, two endogenous C. briggsae X-chromosome regions with strong C. elegans MEX motifs fail to recruit the C. briggsae DCC, as assayed by ChIP-seq and recruitment assays. None of these DCC motifs is enriched on the C. tropicalis draft X sequence, supporting further binding site divergence within the C. briggsae clade. Ongoing ChIP-seq studies in C. tropicalis will help determine how C. elegans and C. briggsae clade motifs are evolutionarily related. Comparison of DCC targeting mechanisms across these four species allows us to characterize a rarely captured event: the recent co-evolution of a protein complex and its rapidly diverged target sequences across an entire X chromosome.
-
[
International Worm Meeting,
2009]
Recently, nine new Caenorhabditis have been discovered, bringing the number of Caenorhabditis species in culture to nineteen, eleven of which are undescribed. To elucidate the relationships of the new species to the five species with sequenced genomes, we have used sequence data from two rRNA genes and several protein-coding genes for reconstructing the phylogenetic tree of Caenorhabditis. Four new species (spp. 5, 9, 10 and 11) group within the so-called Elegans group of Caenorhabditis, with C. elegans being the first branch. Although none of them is the sister species of C. elegans, C. sp. 5 and C. sp. 9 are close relatives of C. briggsae. C. sp. 9 can hybridize with C. briggsae in the laboratory. Of the remaining new species, C. sp. 7 branches off between C. elegans and C. japonica. Three of these species, C. sp. 7, C. sp. 9 and C. sp. 11 have been chosen for genome sequencing. Four further new species branch off before C. japonica within a monophyletic clade which also comprises C. sp. 3 and C. drosophilae. Only one of the new species, C. sp. 11, is hermaphroditic. The position of C. sp. 11 in the phylogeny suggests that hermaphroditism evolved three times within the Elegans group. Two of the new species were isolated from rotting leaves and flowers, and seven from rotting fruit. Rotting fruit is also the habitat in which C. elegans has been found to proliferate (Barriere and Felix, Genetics 2007) and from which C. briggsae, C. brenneri and C. remanei were repeatedly isolated. This suggests that the habitat of the stem species of Caenorhabditis after the divergence of the earliest branches (C. plicata, C. sonorae and C. sp. 1) was rotting fruit. Other characters, like the shape of the stoma and the male tail, introns, susceptibility to RNAi and genome size are being evaluated in the context of the phylogeny. The rate of discovery of new Caenorhabditis species has steadily increased since the description of C. elegans in 1899, with a leap in the last few years. There is no indication that we are even close to knowing all species in this genus.
-
[
International Worm Meeting,
2003]
Previous studies have shown that C. elegans ovo-related gene
lin-48 expresses in a small number of cells including the excretory duct cell. In the related species C. briggsae, the expression is conserved in all cells except the excretory duct. This
lin-48 expression difference affects excretory duct morphogenesis. In C. briggsae, as well as in C. elegans
lin-48(
sa496) mutants, the excretory duct is more anterior than in C. elegans wild type. This indicates that C. elegans
lin-48 (
Ce-lin-48) is involved in duct morphogenesis and positioning, but this gene function is absent in C. briggsae (1). We have made reporter transgenes composed of the
lin-48 regulatory sequences from C. elegans or C. briggsae driving expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP). Tests of these clones in each species showed that only the
Ce-lin-48 is expressed in excretory duct cell in C. elegans animal. These results indicate that there are differences in both cis-regulatory sequences and trans-acting proteins between the two species. By creating chimeric reporter transgenes including C. elegans and C. briggsae regulatory sequences, we have found that one difference between the two species is the presence of regulatory sequences in
Ce-lin-48 that respond to the bZip protein CES-2 (1). The
lin-48 gene expression differences between C. elegans and C. briggsae could result from loss of excretory duct expression in the C.briggsae lineage or acquired expression in the C. elegans lineage. To distinguish between these possibilities, we have analyzed three additional Caenorhabditis species (C. remanei, C. sp. CB5161 and C. sp. PS1010). We found these species have a duct morphology similar to C. briggsae indicating the C. elegans morphology is unique to this species. For comparison to C. elegans and C. briggsae, we have isolated the
lin-48 gene from C. remanei and C. sp. CB5161. Alignment of the
lin-48 regulatory sequences reveals that the sequences are more conserved among C. briggsae, C. remanei and C. sp. 5161. Several conserved domains are absent from C. elegans, whereas the previously identified CES-2 binding sites are absent from the other species. Currently, we are creating
lin-48::gfp reporter transgenes for each species to observe the gene expression patterns. Further experiments with these transgenes will allow us to test whether the differences between C. elegans and the other species result from a loss of repressor elements or gain of activator elements in the C. elegans gene. (1)X. Wang and H. M. Chamberlin (2002) Genes & Development 16: 2345-2349.
-
Kanzaki, Natsumi, Hoshi, Yuki, Kumagai, Ryohei, Sugimoto, Asako, Kikuchi, Taisei, Namai, Satoshi, Tsuyama, Kenji
[
International Worm Meeting,
2017]
Caenorhabditis sp. 34 is a sister species of C. elegans recently isolated from the syconia of the fig Ficus septica on Ishigaki Island, Japan (see abstract by T. Kikuchi, et al.). C. sp. 34 is gonochoric and shares typological key characters with other Elegans supergroup species, but strikingly, adults are nearly twice as long as C. elegans. The optimal culture temperature for C. sp. 34 is significantly higher (27 deg C) than that of C. elegans (20 deg C). Young adult males and females tend to form clumps, and Dauer larvae are rarely observed in laboratory culture conditions. Recently the C. sp. 34 genome assembly was produced into six chromosomes (see abstract by T. Kikuchi, et al.). The marked differences from C. elegans in morphology, behaviors and ecology, and the availability of the complete genome sequence make C. sp. 34 highly attractive for comparative and evolutionary studies. To make C. sp. 34 genetically tractable, we have been developing genetic and molecular techniques and tools. Stable transgenic lines of C. sp.34 could be obtained by microinjecting marker plasmids commonly used in C. elegans, although the efficiency was lower than that in C. elegans. Both soaking and feeding RNAi was as effective as in C. elegans. A panel of antibodies against C. elegans proteins successfully recognized expected structures in C. sp. 34 by immunofluorescence. Thus, many of the rich genetic and molecular resources for C. elegans can be directly used for C. sp. 34 studies. We well present some of the comparative analyses of gene functions regarding the body size, germ cell formation and sex determination.