One of the key components of the stress response is the heat shock transcription factor whose activation leads to synthesis of heat shock proteins. We have analyzed the C. elegans HSF with the help of C. elegans genome project, and found the following features. First, the C. elegans genome appears to encode a single heat shock factor (CeHSF Y53C10A.12), unlike higher metazoans whose genomes encode multiple HSFs. Second, CeHSF encodes a 75 KD protein with a DNA binding domain (residues 87 to 196) and a trimerization domain composed of hydrophobic repeats (HR) A and B (residues 193 to 285). Although the overall identities of CeHSF to S. Cerevisiae (ScHSF) and human HSF (HsHSF) are 17 and 24% respectively, the identities of the DNA binding and trimerization domains to ScHSF and HsHSF are 23 and 40% respectively. Third, sequence analysis of CeHSF showed an apparent lack of HR-C, a regulatory motif of heptad repeats at the C terminus conserved in all known animal HSFs. HR-C has been shown to be important for keeping HSF in a latent monomeric state during unstressed condition. The fact that C. elegans heat shock response has been shown to be inducible, yet CeHSF lacks the HR-C to keep it inactive in normal condition indicates that the mechanism of CeHSF activation may be distinct from other known animal HSFs. Lastly, the EST of C. elegans HSF (EST
yk485h11.5) binds specifically to the consensus heat shock element when expressed as a recombinant fusion protein in bacteria. Currently, we are making antibodies and deletion worms to study the expression and function of CeHSF. In the process of dissecting the regulatory mechanism of HSF, a heat shock binding protein (HSB-1) was cloned and shown to negatively regulate the heat shock response in both C. elegans and mammalian cell lines. The HSB-1 deletion worms have a 30% decrease in life span comparing to N2 wildtype worms. The role of HSB-1 in regulating the heat shock response and its interaction with HSF are being examined using overexpression and deletion worms, as well as mammalian tissue culture models. Satyal SH et. al. Genes and Dev. 1998, 12(13):1962-74. Stringham, EG et. al. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 1992, 3:221-233. Wu, C. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1995, 11: 441-69.