Regulated endocytosis and trafficking of AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs) is critical for synaptic plasticity. However, the specific combinations of clathrin-dependent and -independent mechanisms that mediate AMPAR trafficking in vivo have not been fully characterized. To better understand AMPAR trafficking, we have been examining the trafficking of the AMPAR GLR-1 in C. elegans (1). GLR-1 is localized on synaptic membranes, where it regulates reversals of locomotion in a simple behavioral circuit (2). We previously identified two genes that regulate GLR-1 membrane recycling: RAB-10 and LIN-10 (2, 3). Animals lacking RAB-10, a small GTPase required for endocytic recycling of intestinal cargo, or LIN-10, a PDZ-domain containing protein, share the same phenotype: GLR-1 accumulates in large, internalized accretions and animals display a decreased frequency of reversals (3, 4). Interestingly, reducing clathrin-dependent endocytosis specifically suppresses the
lin-10 mutant phenotype, whereas reducing clathrin-independent endocytosis specifically suppresses the
rab-10 mutant phenotype. Thus, we hypothesize that LIN-10 and RAB-10 recycle AMPARs from intracellular endosomal compartments to synapses along distinct pathways. Moreover, we suspect that another Rab protein, analogous to RAB-10, functions in the LIN-10 pathway. We have taken two approaches to identify additional cellular factors involved in LIN-10-mediated trafficking of GLR-1. First, we have performed a yeast 2-hybrid screen using LIN-10 as bait. We are characterizing the functions of the proteins identified in the screen to determine if they regulate AMPAR trafficking. Second, we are testing all of the known Rab genes in the genome for a role in GLR-1 trafficking, either by analyzing previously identified mutations or by generating mutant transgenes that express GDP- or GTP-locked versions of the Rabs. Our long-term goal is to further define the regulatory pathways involved in the movement and localization of AMPARs at synapses in vivo. 1. Hart, A.C. et al., Nature 378, 82-85 (1995) and Maricq, A.V. et al., Nature 378, 78-81 (1995). 2. Rongo, C. et al., Cell 94, 751-759 (1998). 3. Glodowski, D. et al., Mol Biol Cell 18, 4387-96 (2007). 4. Chen et al., Mol Biol Cell 17, 1286-97 (2006).