The achaete-scute family of proneural genes has been extensively characterized in Drosophila, and valuable information on the role of these genes in promoting neurogenesis has been obtained. The role of these transcription factors in C. elegans neurogenesis remains relatively uncharacterized. As part of our effort to understand the role of
hlh-3 in the differentiation of the hermaphrodite-specific motor neurons (HSNs) (Doonan et al., 2008), we set out to determine the expression pattern of three other achaete-scute-like genes
hlh-6,
hlh-12, and
hlh-19. To determine the identity of the cells that express these proteins, we generated promoter fusion reporter genes. Our first goal was to characterize if they were expressed in the nervous system and whether expression overlapped that of
hlh-3. We, as well as others, have shown that two of these genes are not expressed in the nervous system:
hlh-6 expression is limited to the pharyngeal gland cells (Raharjo and Gaudet, 2007) and
hlh-12 is expressed in the gonadal leader cells (Tamai and Nishiwaki, 2007). Here we report that
hlh-19 is expressed in the nervous system. Multiple neurons express the reporter, notably the pharyngeal neuron M4 and what appears to be a subset of sensory neurons in the head of both males and hermaphrodites. Expression is first detected at the comma stage, and continues throughout postembryonic development and adulthood. Interestingly, the reporter is also expressed in the stomatointestinal and body wall muscles of males but not hermaphrodites. We are currently determining the identity of the neurons in the head. Our future goal is to study the role of
hlh-19 in the specification and differentiation of the
hlh-19 positive neurons. We are currently investigating the consequences of missing gene function using a 218 bp deletion allele of
hlh-19 obtained from the National Bioresource Project, Japan.
hlh-19 (
tm3105), if translated is missing most of the putative DNA binding domain and dimerization region of the protein. Preliminary analysis of
hlh-19 (
tm3105) revealed no obvious phenotype associated with M4 dysfunction however, the mutant is homozygous viable. References: (1) Doonan, Hatzold, Raut, Conradt, and Alfonso 2008. Mechanisms of Development 125:883-893 (2) Raharjo and Gaudet 2007. Developmental Biology 302:295-308 (3) Tamai and Nishiwaki 2007. Developmental Biology 308:562-571.