-
[
Methods Mol Biol,
2020]
This chapter presents methods for exploiting the powerful tools available in the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans to understand the in vivo functions of cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) genes and the organization of their associated signaling pathways. Included are methods for assessing phenotypes caused by loss-of-function mutations in the worm CCM genes
kri-1 and
ccm-3, CRISPR-based gene editing techniques, and protocols for conducting high-throughput forward genetic and small molecule screens.
-
[
Methods Cell Biol,
1995]
A major tool of developmental genetics is the ordering of genes in functional pathways. In this chapter, we explain the logic behind constructing pathways, starting from the knowledge of the relevant phenotypes associated with the genes of interest, assuming that careful analysis of the phenotype has been carried out. We discuss the construction and interpretation of phenotypes of double mutants, screening for and analysis of extragenic suppressors, as well as issues regarding complex pathways and genetic redundancy. Avery and Wasserman (1992) have provided a brief theoretical discussion of epistasis analysis; here we explain the more practical aspects of how models of developmental pathways are built in
-
[
WormBook,
2005]
A genetic enhancer is a mutation in one gene that intensifies the phenotype caused by a mutation in another gene. The phenotype of the double mutant is much stronger than the summation of the single mutant phenotypes. The isolation of enhancers can lead to the identification of interacting genes, including genes that act redundantly with respect to each other. Examples in Caenorhabditis elegans of dominant enhancers are presented first, followed by a review of recessive enhancers of null mutations. In some of these cases, the interacting genes are related in structure and function, but in other cases, the interacting genes are nonhomologous. Recessive enhancers of non-null mutations can also be useful. A powerful advance for the identification of recessive enhancers is genome-wide screening based on RNA interference.
-
[
Methods Mol Biol,
2013]
The principle of commonly used methods to create mutations in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) is straightforward. In general, worms are exposed to a dose of mutagen resulting in DNA damages and mutations. Screening the progeny of the mutagenized animals for a certain phenotype is the regular forward genetic approach in C. elegans. A mutant selected from such a population is stabilized to recover a pure homozygous strain. In this chapter, we categorize the protocol into mutagenesis, phenotype screen, and outcross and provide time-tested procedures for their implementation to create long-lived worm mutants.
-
[
Methods Cell Biol,
1995]
Caenorhabditis elegans is in all likelihood the first metazoan animal whose entire genome will be determined. In addition, a very detailed description of the animal's morphology, development, and physiology is available (see elsewhere in this book, and Wood, 1988). Thus, the complete phenotype and genotype of an animal will be known. What is not known is how genotype determines phenotype; to study this, one needs to establish connections between genome sequence and phenotypes. Much has been done by classic or forward genetics: mutagenesis experiments have identified loci involved in a specific trait. Many of these loci have already been defined at the molecular level, and the genome sequence will certainly aid in the identification of many more. The opposite approach, reverse genetics, becomes naturally more important when more of the genome sequence is determined: Given the sequence of a gene of which nothing else is know, how can the function of that gene be determined? Reverse genetics is more than targeted inactivation. One can study a gene's function by several approaches...|
-
[
WormBook,
2005]
Mutations in many genes can result in a similar phenotype. Finding a number of mutants with the same phenotype tells you little about how many genes you are dealing with, and how mutable those genes are until you can assign those mutations to genetic loci. The genetic assay for gene assignment is called the complementation test. The simplicity and robustness of this test makes it a fundamental genetic tool for gene assignment. However, there are occasional unexpected outcomes from this test that bear explanation. This chapter reviews the complementation test and its various outcomes, highlighting relatively rare but nonetheless interesting exceptions such as intragenic complementation and non-allelic non-complementation.
-
[
Methods Cell Biol,
1995]
Geneticists like to point out that the ultimate test of a proposed function for a gene and its encoded product (or products) in a living organism involves making a mutant and analyzing its phenotype. This is the goal of reverse genetics: a gene is cloned and sequenced, its transcripts and protein coding sequence are analyzed, and a function may be proposed; one must then introduce a mutation in the gene in a living organism to see what the functional consequences are. The analysis of genetic mosaics takes this philosophy a step further. In mosaics, some cells of an individual are genotypically mutant and other cells are genotypically wild type. One then asks what the phenotypic consequences are for the living organism. This is not the same as asking what cells transcribe the gene or in what cells the protein product of the gene is to be found, but rather it is asking in what cells the wild-type gene is needed for a given function...
-
[
Methods Cell Biol,
1995]
DNA transformation assays in a whole organism provide experimental links between molecular structure and phenotype. Experiments with transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans start in general with the injection of DNA into the adult gonad. Effects on phenotype or gene expression patterns can be analyzed either in F1 progeny derived from the injected animals or in derived transgenic lines. Microinjection of C. elegans was first carried out by Kimble et al. (1982). Stinchcomb et al. (1985) then showed that injected DNA could be maintained for several generations in transgenic lines. The first selective methods for producing and maintaining transgenic lines were reported in 1986 (Fire, 1986). These methods have been considerably improved since then (Mello et al., 1991) , so that assays involving DNA transformation are now a standard part of the experimental repertoire for C. elegans.
-
[
WormBook,
2006]
Through genetic analyses, the function of genes is investigated by studying organisms where gene function is altered. In classical forward genetic screening, individuals are treated with mutagens to induce DNA lesions and mutants with a phenotype of interest are sought. After a mutant is found, the gene mutated is identified through standard molecular techniques. Detailed studies of the mutant phenotype coupled with molecular analyses of the gene allows elucidation of the gene's function. Forward genetics has been responsible for our understanding of many biological processes and is an excellent method for identifying genes that function in a particular process.In reverse genetics, the functional study of a gene starts with the gene sequence rather than a mutant phenotype. Using various techniques, a gene's function is altered and the effect on the development or behaviour of the organism is analysed. Reverse genetics is an important complement to forward genetics. For example, using reverse genetics, one can investigate the function of all genes in a gene family, something not easily done with forward genetics. Further, one can study the function of a gene found to be involved in a process of interest in another organism, but for which no forward genetic mutants have yet been identified. Finally, the vast majority of genes have not yet been mutated in most organisms and reverse genetics allows their study. The availability of complete genome sequences combined with reverse genetics can allow every gene to be studied.This chapter gives detailed protocols for the two main methods of perturbing gene function in C. elegans: RNA interference and the creation of deletion mutants. Either technique can be applied to the study of individual genes. With less than a day of actual work, RNAi creates a knockdown of gene function without altering the organism's DNA (see below). In contrast, with about a month of work, a deletion mutation permanently removes all gene function. Deciding which technique to use will depend on the nature of the experiment. The techniques can also be combined, where RNAi is used for rapid screening of loss of function phenotypes and then deletion mutants are made to study genes of particular interest. RNAi can also be carried out on a global scale, where knockdown of (nearly) every gene is tested for inducing a phenotype of interest. In this case, the reverse genetics technique of RNAi can be thought of as a forward genetic screening tool.
-
The world of modern biology is unified by genetics. Genetic approaches have the ability to transcend species and provide cross-links between fields for several reasons. First, is the fact that all species are evolutionarily related. Thus, distinct species have similar gene function, and DNA sequence homology can be found between even distantly related species. Indeed, DNA sequence homology is used as a metric device to determine evolutionary relationships among species. Second, molecular genetic manipulation changes both the genotype and phenotype of an organism. Such manipulations represent an extremely fine-scale tool for dissection of the underlying biochemistry, physiology, anatomy, and development of an individual species. Because virtually any gene can be manipulated at will in many species, a dedicated approach can lead to an unraveling of the relationship between genotype and phenotype for almost any gene in these species.....