There are two prevailing views of neural control of sequential activities in the brain. In the first scheme, feedforward excitation in a synaptic chain would transiently activate different groups of neurons1,2. In the second scheme, sequential neural activity could emerge from mutually inhibited neuron clusters through a winner-take-all strategy3. Here, we investigate neural mechanisms for motor sequence generation in C. elegans during escape responses. Upon a mechanosensory or thermosensory stimulus at a worm's head, the animal will move backward, generate an Omega turn, and then move forward in a new direction4. We found that this rudimentary motor sequence is controlled by a neural circuit that combines the above two schemes. In particular, feedforward excitation is contributed by electrical couplings between interneurons AIB, which encode the backward motor state, and RIV in the turning module via innexin proteins such as INX-15,6. Mutual inhibitions are contributed by glutamate synaptic inputs from AIB to neurons encoding turning and forward motor states5; and cholinergic synaptic inputs from neurons in the turning and forward module to those in the backward module through acetylcholine-gated chloride channels (e.g.,
acc-1,
acc-2,
acc-4)7. Remarkably, when neurons in the turning module were ablated, the statistics of escape responses became consistent with stochastic transitions between backward and forward attractor states at constant rates, leading to prolonged reversals with an exponential dwell time distribution. In other words, feedback inhibition from the turning module plays a critical role in terminating persistent activity in the backward module. Together, our data suggest that feedforward excitation and selective inhibitions between neuron groups contribute to robust and flexible motor sequence generation in C. elegans. Reference: 1. Abeles, M. Corticonics: Neural Circuits of the Cerebral Cortex. Cambridge University Press. 1991. 2. Long M A, Jin D Z, Fee M S. Support for a synaptic chain model of neuronal sequence generation. Nature, 2010, 468(7322): 394. 3. Seeds A M, Ravbar P, Chung P, et al. A suppression hierarchy among competing motor programs drives sequential grooming in Drosophila. Elife, 2014, 3:
e02951. 4. Chalfie, M. et al. The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci 5, 956-964 (1985). 5. White J G, Southgate E, Thomson J N, et al. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 1986, 314(1165): 1-340. 6. Altun Z F, et al. High resolution map of Caenorhabditis elegans gap junction proteins. Developmental Dynamics, 2009, 238. 7. Pereira L, et al. A cellular and regulatory map of the cholinergic nervous system of C. elegans. Elife, 2015, 4:
e12432.