C. elegans is used extensively to study host-pathogen interactions. We have conducted genetic screens to identify mutations that cause resistance to infection by the nematode-specific Gram-positive bacterial pathogen, Microbacterium nematophilum. This bacterium attaches to the rectal and post-anal cuticle and causes slow growth and a defensive swelling of the rectal epithelial cells. Many of the mutations (representing at least 20 different genes) isolated in our screens alter the cuticle of the worm and prevent attachment of bacteria and the establishment of an infection.
We used whole genome sequencing to identify one of these mutants,
bus-10, as ZK596.3. This gene encodes a 322 amino acid nematode-specific protein, predicted to be integral to the membrane. We have characterised several large deletions of the gene as well as multiple transposon insertions derived from a
mut-7 induced mutagenesis screen, in which
bus-10 was found to be a conspicuous hot-spot for transposon-induced mutation (>30
bus-10 alleles recovered). Two EMS-chemically induced alleles were identified as stop mutations in exons 2 and 3. Using a bicistronic construct with the
bus-10 promoter and gene linked to the
gpd2/3 sequence and TagRFPT, we demonstrate that a transgenic worm strain expressing ZK596.3 can rescue the Bus-10 phenotype. We find that the
bus-10 promoter is active in many tissues, most notably in the seam cells, rectal gland cell, rectal valve and the excretory gland.
In addition to preventing attachment of M. nematophilum,
bus-10 mutants are also strikingly altered in the response to two other pathogens, Leucobacter strains Verde1 and Verde2. Whereas wild type worms survive infection by Verde 1, but are killed by infections with Verde2,
bus-10 worms, in contrast, are killed by infection with Verde1, but survive infection with Verde2. We have use the differential susceptibility of
bus-10 infection by Verde1 to conduct a suppressor screen for mutagenised
bus-10 worms that can survive on Verde1. This screen identified 8 suppressors, and initial mapping followed by complementation assays suggest that we have identified 8 alleles of one extragenic suppressor gene. We will present further data on the identification and properties of this suppressor gene and propose a model to explain how the interactions of
bus-10 and its suppressor result in the striking differential responses of these worms to infection by two different Leucobacter strains.