We are interested in determining to what extent the pathways that govern blastomere identity and fates in the early embryo have been conserved between C. elegans and related nematode species, including the closely related C. briggsae and more distantly related Acrebeloides nanus (formerly,Cephalobus sp). We have been using the reverse genetic technique of dsRNA-mediated interference (RNAi) to disrupt the activity of a number of homologous genes. For some of these genes (
hlh-1,
glp-1,
par-3,
skn-1) the phenotypes obtained by RNAi knockdown are similar or identical for both C. elegans and C. briggsae, indicating that gene function has been conserved. For example,
skn-1 (RNAi) embryos of C. briggsae lack gut and produce excess hypodermis, a phenotype similar to genetic
skn-1 loss-of-function C. elegans mutants. We have also closely examined the phenocopies of
skn-1 (RNAi) C. elegans embryos, particularly for (lack of) gut differentiation, as the strongest
skn-1 mutant allele (
zu67) may not be null, and have performed in situ hybridization on both
skn-1 (RNAi) and
skn-1 (
zu67) animals. We are also using feeding protocols and heat shock promoters to deliver dsRNA at later stages of development in an attempt to further differentiate maternal from zygotic functions. Furthermore, by testing the ability of cloned homologs from one nematode species to interfere with gene activity in another species, we have observed species and strain differences in susceptibility to RNAi cross-interference, with C. briggsae appearing more sensitive than C. elegans. We have used cross-interference to our advantage to knockdown actin gene function in another nematode species, A. nanus. We are now using degenerate PCR and RNAi to clone and study genes of interest from A. nanus, which displays some developmental characteristics significantly different from those of C. elegans and C. briggsae. These differences include specification of the gut through negative inductive interactions and an ability to regulate and may represent a more primitive (i.e, ancestral) mode of development (see Wiegner & Schierenberg (1998) Dev Biol 204, 3-14).