Glutamate-gated chloride channels (GluCl) are unique to the invertebrate phyla and as such present an excellent target for selectively toxic antiparasitics and insecticides. However, relatively little is known about their physiological roles. We are using C. elegans as a model system to address these issues, employing the behavioural analysis of gene knockouts by deletion or RNAi. Foraging behaviour in C. elegans is characterised by long forward runs interspersed with shorter periods of reverse movements and turns. This involves glutamatergic transmission through excitatory NMDA receptors. Loss of function increases the duration of forward movement (1). Here we show that mutants for
avr-14,
avr-15,
glc-3 and
glc-4 have a reduced duration of forward movement, raising the possibility of a functional interaction between excitatory and inhibitory glutamate receptors. This is enhanced in the
avr-14/15 double mutant and phenocopied in animals treated with RNAi for either
avr-14 or
avr-15, but not GluCl?. Furthermore, we were able to rescue the deficit observed in
avr-14 mutant worms by transformation with either the H. contortus HcGluCl?3A or HcGluCl?3B subunits under the
avr-14 promoter, thus indicating the functional inter-changeability of these H. contortus subunits with their C. elegans counterparts. We are intrigued by the reciprocal role of excitatory and inhibitory glutamate receptors in the interneurones controlling directional movement. Depolarisation of command interneurones leads to the initiation of backward movement (1) whereas hyperpolarisation by GluCl activation at the same synapses leads to an increased duration of forward movement. Thus GluCls at sensory neurone-command interneurone synapses may provide a means of fine tuning coincidence detection of sensory inputs. Whilst the specific GluCl subunits involved in this circuit have yet to be determined, locomotion assay data points to the possible involvement of
avr-14,
avr-15,
glc-3 and
glc-4 as potential molecular determinants within this circuit. 1) Brockie et al. 2001 Neuron 31:617-30 We would like to thank the BBSRC GAIN Initiative for their financial support.