Charlesworth AG et al. (2019) Cell "Next-Gen Learning: The C.elegans Approach."

Claycomb JM, Seroussi U, Charlesworth AG

[Cell, 2019]

In this issue, Moore etal. and Posner etal., provide evidence for how the activity of the nervous system in C.elegans results in gene expression changes in the germline to pass on parental experiences and learned behavior to their progeny.

Moore RS et al. (2021) STAR Protoc "Protocol for transgenerational learned pathogen avoidance behavior assays in Caenorhabditis elegans."

Moore RS, Murphy CT, Kaletsky R

[STAR Protoc, 2021]

Animal experiences, including learned behaviors, can be passed down to several generations of progeny in a phenomenon known as transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Yet, little is known regarding the molecular mechanisms regulating physiologically relevant transgenerational memories. Here, we present a method for <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> in which worms learn to avoid the pathogen <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PA14). Unlike previous protocols, this training paradigm, either using PA14 lawns or through exposure to a PA14 small RNA (P11), induces memory in four generations of progeny. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Moore etal. (2019) and Kaletsky etal. (2020).

Reboul J et al. (2001) Nat Genet "Open-reading-frame sequence tags (OSTs) support the existence of at least 17,300 genes in C. elegans."

Doucette-Stamm L, Lamesch PE, Reboul J, Temple GF, Hartley JL, Brasch MA, Hill DE, Vaglio P, Thierry-Mieg N, Shin-i T, Lee H, Moore T, Vandenhaute J, Kohara Y, Vidal M, Jackson C, Thierry-Mieg J, Tzellas N, Thierry-Mieg D, Hitti J

[Nat Genet, 2001]

The genome sequences of Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and Arabidopsis thaliana have been predicted to contain 19,000, 13,600 and 25,500 genes, respectively. Before this information can be fully used for evolutionary and functional studies, several issues need to be addressed. First, the gene number estimates obtained in silico and not yet supported by any experimental data need to be verified. For example, it seems biologically paradoxical that C. elegans would have 50% more genes than Drosophilia. Second, intron/exon predictions need to be tested experimentally. Third, complete sets of open reading frames (ORFs), or "ORFeomes," need to be cloned into various expression vectors. To address these issues simultaneously, we have designed and applied to C. elegans the following strategy. Predicted ORFs are amplified by PCR from a highly representative cDNA library using ORF-specific primers, cloned by Gateway recombination cloning and then sequenced to generate ORF sequence tags (OSTs) as a way to verify identity and splicing. In a sample (n=1,222) of the nearly 10,000 genes predicted ab initio (that is, for which no expressed sequence tag (EST) is available so far), at least 70% were verified by OSTs. We also observed that 27% of these experimentally confirmed genes have a structure different from that predicted by GeneFinder. We now have experimental evidence that supports the existence of at least 17,300 genes in C. elegans. Hence we suggest that gene counts based primarily on ESTs may underestimate the number of genes in human and in other organisms.AD - Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.FAU - Reboul, JAU - Reboul JFAU - Vaglio, PAU - Vaglio PFAU - Tzellas, NAU - Tzellas NFAU - Thierry-Mieg, NAU - Thierry-Mieg NFAU - Moore, TAU - Moore TFAU - Jackson, CAU - Jackson CFAU - Shin-i, TAU - Shin-i TFAU - Kohara, YAU - Kohara YFAU - Thierry-Mieg, DAU - Thierry-Mieg DFAU - Thierry-Mieg, JAU - Thierry-Mieg JFAU - Lee, HAU - Lee HFAU - Hitti, JAU - Hitti JFAU - Doucette-Stamm, LAU - Doucette-Stamm LFAU - Hartley, J LAU - Hartley JLFAU - Temple, G FAU - Temple GFFAU - Brasch, M AAU - Brasch MAFAU - Vandenhaute, JAU - Vandenhaute JFAU - Lamesch, P EAU - Lamesch PEFAU - Hill, D EAU - Hill DEFAU - Vidal, MAU - Vidal MLA - engID - R21 CA81658 A 01/CA/NCIID - RO1 HG01715-01/HG/NHGRIPT - Journal ArticleCY - United StatesTA - Nat GenetJID - 9216904SB - IM

Ouyang YB et al. (1998) J Biol Chem "Molecular cloning and expression of human and mouse tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase-2 and a tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase homologue in Caenorhabditis elegans."

Moore KL, Ouyang YB

[J Biol Chem, 1998]

Tyrosine O-sulfation, a common post-translational modification in eukaryotes, is mediated by Golgi enzymes that catalyze the transfer of the sulfuryl group from 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate to tyrosine residues in polypeptides. We recently isolated cDNAs encoding human and mouse tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase-1 (Ouyang, Y. B., Lane, W. S., and Moore, K. L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 2896-2901). Here we report the isolation of cDNAs encoding a second tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase (TPST), designated TPST-2. The human and mouse TPST-2 cDNAs predict type II transmembrane proteins of 377 and 376 amino acid residues, respectively. The cDNAs encode functional N-glycosylated enzymes when expressed in mammalian cells. In addition, preliminary analysis indicates that TPST-1 and TPST-2 have distinct specificities toward peptide substrates. The human TPST-2 gene is on chromosome 22q12.1, and the mouse gene is in the central region of chromosome 5. We have also identified a cDNA that encodes a TPST in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that maps to the right arm of chromosome III. Thus, we have identified two new members of a class of membrane-bound sulfotransferases that catalyze tyrosine O-sulfation. These enzymes may catalyze tyrosine O-sulfation of a variety of protein substrates involved in diverse physiologic functions.

Beisswanger R et al. (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A "Existence of distinct tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase genes: molecular characterization of tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase-2."

Beisswanger R, Corbeil D, Ashman K, Vannier C, Thiele C, Kellner R, Niehrs C, Dohrmann U, Huttner WB

[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1998]

Tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase (TPST) is a 54- to 50-kDa integral membrane glycoprotein of the trans-Golgi network found in essentially all tissues investigated, catalyzing the tyrosine O-sulfation of soluble and membrane proteins passing through this compartment. Here we describe (i) an approach to identify the TPST protein, referred to as MSC (modification after substrate crosslinking) labeling, which is based on the crosslinking of a substrate peptide to TPST followed by intramolecular [35S]sulfate transfer from the cosubstrate 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS); and (ii) the molecular characterization of a human TPST, referred to as TPST-2, whose sequence is distinct from that reported [TPST-1; Ouyang, Y.-B., Lane, W. S. &amp; Moore, K. L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2896-2901] while this study was in progress. Human TPST-2 is a type II transmembrane protein of 377 aa residues that is encoded by a ubiquitously expressed 1.9-kb mRNA originating from seven exons of a gene located on chromosome 22 (22q12.1). A 304-residue segment in the luminal domain of TPST-2 shows 75% amino acid identity to the corresponding segment of TPST-1, including conservation of the residues implicated in the binding of PAPS. Expression of the TPST-2 cDNA in CHO cells resulted in an approximately 13-fold increase in both TPST protein, as determined by MSC labeling, and TPST activity. A predicted 359-residue type II transmembrane protein in Caenorhabditis elegans with 45% amino acid identity to TPST-2 in a 257-residue segment of the luminal domain points to the evolutionary conservation of the TPST protein family.

Fan Y et al. (2004) Nat Genet "Mutations in a member of the Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins causes Bardet-Biedl syndrome."

Blacque OE, Fan Y, Ansley SJ, Davidson WS, Baillie DL, Leroux MR, Van Haelst MM, Ross AJ, Green JS, Katsanis N, Parfrey PS, Beales PL, Compton DS, May-Simera H, Badano JL, Boroevich K, Moore SJ, Esmail MA, Lewis RA

[Nat Genet, 2004]

RAB, ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs) and ARF-like (ARL) proteins belong to the Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins and are essential for various membrane-associated intracellular trafficking processes. None of the approximately 50 known members of this family are linked to human disease. Using a bioinformatic screen for ciliary genes in combination with mutational analyses, we identified ARL6 as the gene underlying Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 3, a multisystemic disorder characterized by obesity, blindness, polydactyly, renal abnormalities and cognitive impairment. We uncovered four different homozygous substitutions in ARL6 in four unrelated families affected with Bardet-Biedl syndrome, two of which disrupt a threonine residue important for GTP binding and function of several related small GTP-binding proteins. Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans ARL6 homolog indicates that it is specifically expressed in ciliated cells, and that, in addition to the postulated cytoplasmic functions of ARL proteins, it undergoes intraflagellar transport. These findings implicate a small GTP-binding protein in ciliary transport and the pathogenesis of a pleiotropic disorder.

Glock C et al. (2015) Methods Mol Biol "Microbial Rhodopsin Optogenetic Tools: Application for Analyses of Synaptic Transmission and of Neuronal Network Activity in Behavior."

Glock C, Gottschalk A, Nagpal J

[Methods Mol Biol, 2015]

Optogenetics was introduced as a new technology in the neurosciences about a decade ago (Zemelman et al., Neuron 33:15-22, 2002; Boyden et al., Nat Neurosci 8:1263-1268, 2005; Nagel et al., Curr Biol 15:2279-2284, 2005; Zemelman et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1352-1357, 2003). It combines optics, genetics, and bioengineering to render neurons sensitive to light, in order to achieve a precise, exogenous, and noninvasive control of membrane potential, intracellular signaling, network activity, or behavior (Rein and Deussing, Mol Genet Genomics 287:95-109, 2012; Yizhar et al., Neuron 71:9-34, 2011). As C. elegans is transparent, genetically amenable, has a small nervous system mapped with synapse resolution, and exhibits a rich behavioral repertoire, it is especially open to optogenetic methods (White et al., Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 314:1-340, 1986; De Bono et al., Optogenetic actuation, inhibition, modulation and readout for neuronal networks generating behavior in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, In: Hegemann P, Sigrist SJ (eds) Optogenetics, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2013; Husson et al., Biol Cell 105:235-250, 2013; Xu and Kim, Nat Rev Genet 12:793-801, 2011). Optogenetics, by now an &quot;exploding&quot; field, comprises a repertoire of different tools ranging from transgenically expressed photo-sensor proteins (Boyden et al., Nat Neurosci 8:1263-1268, 2005; Nagel et al., Curr Biol 15:2279-2284, 2005) or cascades (Zemelman et al., Neuron 33:15-22, 2002) to chemical biology approaches, using photochromic ligands of endogenous channels (Szobota et al., Neuron 54:535-545, 2007). Here, we will focus only on optogenetics utilizing microbial rhodopsins, as these are most easily and most widely applied in C. elegans. For other optogenetic tools, for example the photoactivated adenylyl cyclases (PACs, that drive neuronal activity by increasing synaptic vesicle priming, thus exaggerating rather than overriding the intrinsic activity of a neuron, as occurs with rhodopsins), we refer to other literature (Weissenberger et al., J Neurochem 116:616-625, 2011; Steuer Costa et al., Photoactivated adenylyl cyclases as optogenetic modulators of neuronal activity, In: Cambridge S (ed) Photswitching proteins, Springer, New York, 2014). In this chapter, we will give an overview of rhodopsin-based optogenetic tools, their properties and function, as well as their combination with genetically encoded indicators of neuronal activity. As there is not &quot;the&quot; single optogenetic experiment we could describe here, we will focus more on general concepts and &quot;dos and don'ts&quot; when designing an optogenetic experiment. We will also give some guidelines on which hardware to use, and then describe a typical example of an optogenetic experiment to analyze the function of the neuromuscular junction, and another application, which is Ca(2+) imaging in body wall muscle, with upstream neuronal excitation using optogenetic stimulation. To obtain a more general overview of optogenetics and optogenetic tools, we refer the reader to an extensive collection of review articles, and in particular to volume 1148 of this book series, &quot;Photoswitching Proteins.&quot;