Glutamate synapses are highly dynamic, and their restructuring provides the cellular basis of learning and memory. Failure to properly form or maintain glutamate synapses can lead to a variety of neurological disorders, and controlling their abundance and activity is critical for maximizing functional recovery after stroke. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the formation and function of these connections in vivo during normal nervous system development are not well understood. Expression of channelrhodopsin in the glutamatergic sensory neuron ASH1 enabled us to combine optogenetic control of a simple glutamate-dependent behavior, the nose-touch response, with a focused RNAi screen to identify novel genes important for glutamate synapse function. RNAi knockdown of
ver-4, a VEGF receptor homolog2, resulted in a strong defect in ASH-stimulated glutamate-dependent locomotor reversals, but did not affect overall glutamate-independent locomotion based on thrashing assays. Analysis of worms with loss of function mutations in
ver-4 confirmed these RNAi results. The intensity and density of the presynaptic vesicle marker RAB-3::mCherry, expressed specifically in ASH, was unaltered in
ver-4 mutants. In contrast, we observed widespread alterations in the size and intensity of GLR-1::GFP puncta in the nerve ring and ventral nerve cord of
ver-4 mutants, suggesting that VER-4 globally affects GLR-1 levels. Confocal imaging of GLR-1 tagged with both mCherry and pH-sensitive superecliptic pHluorin (SEP::mCherry::GLR-1)3 indicated that
ver-4 mutants exhibit a preferential loss of cell surface GLR-1. Consistent with this data,
ver-4 mutants suppressed the increase in glutamate-dependent spontaneous reversals observed in animals expressing a constitutively-active form of GLR-14. Mutants lacking the VER-4 ligand PVF-15 also exhibited defects in the nose-touch response suggesting that ligand binding may be required for VER-4-mediated promotion of glutamate signaling. Together, our data identify VER-4 and its ligand as novel regulators of GLR-1 trafficking and signaling. Future experiments will identify the cellular and subcellular site of action of VER-4 and the mechanism by which PVF-1 and VER-4 regulate GLR-1 trafficking. References: 1. Ezcurra, M., et al. (2011) EMBO J 30:1110 2. Popovici, C., et al. (2002) Neurosci. Lett. 329:116 3. Hoerndli, F. J., et al. (2013) Neuron 80:1421 4. Zheng, Y., et al. (1999) Neuron 24:347-361 5. Dalpe, G., et al. (2013) Development 140:4020