The C. elegans genome contains 25 innexin (INX) genes, which encode proteins for gap junctions (GJs) and hemichannels. A single type of cells often expresses two or more INXs. Little is known why multiple INXs are expressed in the same cells. To gain insight into this question, we assessed potential body-wall muscle expression for all the INXs by expressing promoter::GFP transcriptional fusions, and analyzed potential contributions of all but three INXs (INX-3, -12, -13) to electrical coupling by recording junctional current (Ij) between neighboring muscle cells. The expression of three INXs is observed in body-wall muscle cells, including INX-11, -18 and UNC-9. Comparisons of Ij between wild type and innexin mutants, however, suggest that six INXs contribute to muscle electrical coupling, including UNC-9, INX-1, -10, -11, -16, and -18. These INXs appear to contribute to the coupling cell-autonomously because the Ij deficiency in each specific INX mutant is rescued completely by expressing a corresponding wild-type INX specifically in muscle. Loss-of-function (lf) mutation of
inx-1, -10, -11 or -16 inhibits Ij to a comparable degree (50~65%), and the Ij deficiency does not become more severe in various double mutants, raising the possibility that all the four INXs may contribute to the function of a single population of GJs.
unc-9(lf) inhibited coupling by ~65%, which is not worsened by
inx-18(lf) although Ij is decreased by ~40% in
inx-18(lf) single mutant, suggesting that INX-18 and UNC-9 might be involved in the function of a single population of GJs. In double or triple mutants affecting both populations of GJs, Ij is essentially undetectable. Consistent with their roles in electrical coupling, five of the six INXs show punctate localization at muscle intercellular junctions when expressed as GFP fusion proteins. The remaining one (INX-11) shows diffuse expression in the cell membrane. These analyses present an unexpectedly complex picture about potential functions of INXs in C. elegans body-wall muscle.