The canal-associated neurons (CANL/R) are two bilaterally symmetric neurons that are born in the head and migrate to the middle of the embryo. Each neuron extends two processes: one process grows to the head and one to the tail (1). The CANs are essential for viability. Sulston and Hodgkin originally discovered that killing the CANs with laser microsurgery resulted in a starved appearance and larval arrest, leading them to propose that the CANs were the nematode soul (2). Similarly,
ceh-10(
gm58) mutants lack CANs and die as larvae (3). In
vab-8(
e1017) mutants, the CAN neurons fail to migrate, and their posterior processes only extend a short distance. As a consequence, the part of the body that lacks CAN processes becomes much thinner and the worms exhibit a withered tail phenotype (4). We identified a mutation that suppresses the withered tail phenotype of
vab-8 mutants and the larval lethality of
ceh-10 mutants. Surprisingly, the double mutants still retain defective CANs, which indicates that the suppressor mutation bypasses the requirement for CAN function. The suppressor encodes
kin-29, a serine threonine kinase most homologous to members of the ELKL motif kinase (EMK) family and salt-induced kinase family (5). KIN-29 and its homologs phosphorylate and inhibit class II histone deacetylases. In C. elegans, KIN-29 inhibits HDA-4, which acts with the MADS domain transcription factor MEF-2 to regulate chemoreceptor gene expression (6). Loss of HDA-4 or MEF-2 is not lethal, indicating that KIN-29 must have other targets that mediate CAN function. The pseudocoelom fills with fluid in animals with compromised CAN function. This phenotype and the association of the CAN processes with the excretory canals led us to test the model where the CANs essential function is to regulate the activity of the excretory canals. The analysis of CAN and excretory canal mutants suggest that the CANs regulate other cells, and we are currently attempting to identify CAN target cells by addressing where KIN-29 functions. REFERENCES: 1.Sulston, J.E., E.Schierenberg, J.G. White and Thomson, J.N. (1983) Dev. Biol. 100: 64-119 2.Sulston, J.E. and Hodgkin, J.A. Worm Breeder's Gazette 5(1): 19 3.Forrester, W.C., Garriga, G. (1997) Development 124(9): 1831-43. 4.Manser, J. Wood, W.B. (1990) Dev Gen 11:49-64 5.Lanjuin, A., Sengupta, P. (2002) Neuron 33(3): 369-81 6.van der Linden, A.M., Nolan, K., Sengupta, P. (2007) EMBO. 26(2): 358-70.