[
1987]
Since the last review in this series [Johnson, 1985], many papers have appeared dealing directly with the aging process in both Caenorhabditis elegans and Turbatrix aceti. We will review this work and also briefly review other areas of C. elegans research that may impact on the study of aging. C. elegans has become a major biological model; four "News" articles in Science [Lewin, 1984a,b; Marx, 1984a,b] and inclusion as one of three developmental genetics models in a recent text [Wilkins, 1986] indicate its importance. Recent work has verified earlier results and has advanced progress toward new goals, such as routine molecular cloning. The aging studies reviewed here, together with new findings from other areas of C. elegans research, lay the groundwork for rapid advances in our understanding of aging in nematodes. Several areas of research in C. elegans have been reviewed recently: the genetic approach to understanding the cell lineage [Sternberg and Horvitz, 1984] and a brief summary of cell lineage mutants [Hedgecock, 1985]. The specification of neuronal development and neural connectivity has been a continuing theme in C. elegans research and reviews of these areas have also appeared [Chalfie, 1984; White, 1985]. A major genetic advance is the development of reliable, if not routine, mosaic analysis [Herman, 1984; Herman and Kari, 1985], which is useful for the genetic analysis of tissue-limited gene expression. Hodgkin [1985] reviews studies on a series of mutants involved in the specification of sex. These include her mutations that cause XO worms (normally males) to develop as hermaphrodites and tra mutations that change XX hermaphrodites into phenotypic males. The work on the structure and development of nematode muscle has been summarized by Waterston and Francis [1985]. A comprehensive review of aging research, containing useful reference material on potential biomarkers, has appeared [Johnson and Simpson, 1985], as well as a review including
[
2000]
Computer tracking of Caenorhabditis elegans, a free-living soil nematode, is a promising tool to assess behavioral changes upon exposure to contaminants. A short life cycle, a known genetic make-up, thoroughly studied behavior, and a completely mapped nervous system make C. elegans an attractive soil test organism with many advantages over the commonly used earthworm. Although many toxicity tests have been performed with C. elegans, the majority focused on mortality, a much less sensitive endpoint than behavior. A computer tracking system has been developed to monitor behavioral changes using C. elegans. Because conditions unrelated to specific toxicant exposures, such as changes in temperature, developmental stage, and presence of adequate food sources, can affect behavior, there is a need to standardize tracking procedures. To this end, we have developed reference charts for control movement comparing the movement of four and five day-old adult nematodes. The use of K-medium versus deionized (DI) H2O for pre-tracking rinses was also investigated. A final reference chart compared the behavioral responses of nematodes at various food densities (i.e. bacterial concentrations).
[
1987]
To my knowledge, a theory of "developmentally programmed aging" has never been explicitly stated, although the notion that aging has some relationship to development has certainly been proposed many times. In the preceding chapter (36), Dr. Hayflick has made a brief description of the central idea of developmental programming within aging. In order to discuss relevant evidence in this chapter, I would like to propose the following, somewhat more specific and operational definition: The theory of developmentally programmed aging posits that aging involves events controlled in ways recognizably similar to those that operate during development. This definition is perhaps a little less extreme than it might have been, since it uses the phrase "aging involves events" rather than the phrase "aging is caused by events." However, I think it captures most of the usual connotations of "developmentally programmed aging," and it at least has the virtue of testability. Of course, to test the theory, as defined, requires evidence of several sorts. In particular, it requires (a) that we understand how some aging events are controlled, (b) that we understand how some developmental events are controlled, and (c) that we know how to recognize whether there is or is not similarity between the two. A central message of what follows is that we are really only at the beginning of being able to test this theory, although some lines of approach do appear