[
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
1999]
In a recent TREE news & comment, Gadagkar made some useful comments on LaMunyon and Ward's interesting study on sexual reproduction in nematodes. I think, however, that he - and LaMunyon and Ward - have confused the benefits of sex for species or demes with those for individuals or genes.
[
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
1999]
In a recent TREE news & comment, Gadagkar made some useful comments on LaMunyon and Ward's interesting study on sexual reproduction in nematodes. I think, however, that he - and LaMunyon and Ward - have confused the benefits of sex for species or demes with those for individuals or genes. For females and hermaphrodites (but not for species or demes), the twofold cost of sexual reproduction or producing males' in Maynard Smith's sense implies the cost of producing offspring that have only half of the hermaphrodite parent's genome set - not directly that of producing males. An offspring of a hermaphrodite Caenorhabditis briggsae inherits half, not more, of each parental genome set. The hermaphrodite parent still pays the two fold cost of sexual reproduction in the same way as
[
Trends in Ecology & Evolution,
1998]
Sexual reproduction is perhaps the greatest of all evolutionary puzzles. It's a puzzle because sexually reproducing species pay the cost of spending half their resources (over and above what is needed for vegetative growth) in producing males, whereas parthogenetic species utilize all their resources meant for reproduction in producing only females (or hermaphrodites) like themselves. This twofold cost of sexual reproduction is sometimes referred to as the twofold cost of producing males. Three advantages of sexual reproduction that might offset this cost have been proposed. Genetic recombination and cross fertilization permit sexually reproducing species to (1) bring together, in the same individual, mutations arising in different individuals; (2) generate genetic variability and thus adapt to changing environments; and (3) shuffle their genes in every generation and thus keep parasites at bay. While evolutionary biologists are busy testing their favourite ideas for offsetting the twofold cost of producing males, recent work by Craig LaMunyon and Samuel Ward shows that a nematode, Caenorhabditis briggsae, appears to have found a way of gaining the benefits of sexual reproduction without paying the cost of producing males.