The engulfment and removal of apoptotic cells is important both for development in metazoans and for maintaining tissue homeostasis in adult animals. The process has been studied extensively in C. elegans and pioneering work has revealed much of the underlying genetic program[1, 2]. Dying cells activate two parallel pathways in engulfing cells involving, in one case,
ced-1,
ced-6 and
ced-7, and in the other,
ced-2,
ced-5 and
ced-12[2]. These two pathways have been shown to converge on
ced-10, which encodes the worm Rac1 homologue[3, 4].
ced-10 is required for the cytoskeletal changes necessary for efficient engulfment; in
ced-10 mutants the actin halos that are normally generated within the engulfing cell fail to form[3]. Here we describe a new calponin homology domain protein that promotes engulfment of apoptotic germline cells. The protein binds directly to F-actin in vitro, suggesting that it affects engulfment by altering actin dynamics. Furthermore, the protein is found to localise around the periphery of germline apoptotic cells with highly condensed chromatin. Reduction of gene activity by RNAi causes defects in engulfment of germline cells. To investigate the gene in more detail we isolated two deletion alleles,
sv63 and
sv64, both likely to be strong hypomorphic or null alleles. The homozygous mutants display a fully penetrant sterile phenotype. Phalloidin staining of the maternally rescued animals indicates gross changes in actin distribution, particularly within the germline. When depleted of maternal gene activity, the mutant embryos display ventral enclosure defects similar to those seen in embryos completely lacking
ced-10 activity[5]. In support of this finding, the protein is highly expressed in the leading migrating cells during ventral enclosure. Our experiments thus identify a new modulator of the actin cytoskeleton that affects both the engulfment of apoptotic cells in the germline as well as embryonic enclosure. References: 1.Ellis, R.E., J.Y. Yuan, and H.R. Horvitz, Annu Rev Cell Biol, 1991. 7: p. 663-98. 2.Lettre, G. and M.O. Hengartner, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2006. 7(2): p. 97-108. 3.Kinchen, J.M., et al., Nature, 2005. 434(7029): p. 93-9. 4.Reddien, P.W. and H.R. Horvitz, Nat Cell Biol, 2000. 2(3): p. 131-6. 5.Lundquist, E.A., et al., Development, 2001. 128(22): p. 4475-88.