-
[
WormBook,
2007]
Because of their free-living life cycle alternatives, Strongyloides and related nematode parasites may represent the best models for translating C. elegans science to the study of nematode parasitism. S. stercoralis, a significant pathogen of humans, can be maintained in laboratory dogs and gerbils. Biosafety precautions necessary for work with S. stercoralis, though unfamiliar to many C. elegans researchers, are straightforward and easily accomplished. Although specialized methods are necessary for large-scale culture of the free-living stages of S. stercoralis, small-scale cultures for experimental purposes may be undertaken using minor modifications of standard C. elegans methods. Similarly, the morphological similarities between C. elegans and the free-living stages of S. stercoralis allow investigational methods such as laser cell ablation and DNA transformation by gonadal microinjection to be easily adapted from C. elegans to S. stercoralis. Comparative studies employing these methods have yielded new insights into the neuronal control of the infective process in parasites and its similarity to regulation of dauer development in C. elegans. Furthermore, we have developed a practical method for transient transformation of S. stercoralis with vector constructs having various tissue- and cell-specific expression patterns and have assembled these into a modular vector kit for distribution to the community.
-
In the next five years, molecular biology will get its first look at the complete genetic code of a multicellular animal. The Caenorhabditis elegans genome sequencing project, a collaboration between Robert Waterston's group in St. Louis and John Sulston's group in Cambridge, is currently on schedule towards its goal of obtaining the complete sequence of this organism and all its estimated 15,000 to 20,000 genes by 1998. By that time, we should also know the complete genome sequence of a few other organisms as well, including the prokaryote Escherichia coli and the single-celled eukaryote Saccharomyces
-
[
1981]
A neuron can be characterized by its morphology, transmitter (s?), receptor(s) and the nature of its synaptic contacts (chemical or electrical; excitatory or inhibitory; number and distribution of synapses; identity of the cells to which it is presynaptic or postsynaptic). It is clear that according to such criteria nervous sytems consist of neurons of many distinct types. The origin of neuronal diversity is unknown. Both how such diversity is generated during development and how the relevant developmental programme is encoded in the genome remain to
-
Sorrentino V, Deplancke B, Ouhmad T, Cornaglia M, Gijs MA, Auwerx J, Williams EG, Krishnamani G, Frochaux MV, Nicolet-Dit-Felix AA, Lin T, Mouchiroud L
[
Curr Protoc Neurosci,
2016]
Phenotyping strategies in simple model organisms such as D. melanogaster and C. elegans are often broadly limited to growth, aging, and fitness. Recently, a number of physical setups and video tracking software suites have been developed to allow for accurate, quantitative, and high-throughput analysis of movement in flies and worms. However, many of these systems require precise experimental setups and/or fixed recording formats. We report here an update to the Parallel Worm Tracker software, which we termed the Movement Tracker. The Movement Tracker allows variable experimental setups to provide cross-platform automated processing of a variety of movement characteristics in both worms and flies and permits the use of simple physical setups that can be readily implemented in any laboratory. This software allows high-throughput processing capabilities and high levels of flexibility in video analysis, providing quantitative movement data on C. elegans and D. melanogaster in a variety of different conditions. 2016 by John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
-
[
Methods Cell Biol,
1995]
Although Caenorhabditis elegans was originally chosen as a model organism for cell biology with serial section electron microscopy (EM) methods in mind, these methods have remained a daunting challenge. There is an apocryphal story that Nichol Thomson originally advised Sydney Brenner that C. elegans was unsuitable for electron microscopy and that Brenner should choose another species. Other experienced microscopists have probably shared similar dark thoughts from time to time. Nonetheless, the worm's very small size, simple organization, and cablelike nervous system have permitted Brenner's colleagues to characterize every cell and cell contact in the wild-type animal, potentiating the genetic characterization of cellular development in remarkable detail. We attempt to provide an adequate background for anyone to initiate EM studies of C. elegans. Two decades ago, as the first of Brenner's postdoctoral fellows left his laboratory to establish new worm laboratories, it was standard practice to include an EM component in their studies. Their combined efforts to characterize the adult animal's cell types and the essential steps in its development helped to erect a lovely scaffold of key manuscripts, capped by the description of the "Mind of the Worm" in some 600 micrographs and 175 drawings. Many of these works required technical heroics or suffered long delays before publication. Most people later chose to leave electron microscopy behind in pursuit of molecular quarry. The fruits of their molecular and genetic studies should soon stimulate a renewed flowering of electron microscopy. We hope to smooth your entry or reentry into these techniques. We also summarize our methods for three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction, based largely on film techniques introduced by John White and Randle Ware. Digital imaging techniques seem poised to make 3D reconstruction more accessible, and may simplify the exchange of morphological data between laboratories. We discuss several computer systems that the C. elegans community could adopt for high-resolution studies of structure and function. In addition, we briefly cover several specialized specimen preparation techniques for electron microscopy, including freeze fracture and electron microscopic immunocytochemistry.
-
[
WormBook,
2005]
Cell-division control affects many aspects of development. Caenorhabditis elegans cell-cycle genes have been identified over the past decade, including at least two distinct Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDKs), their cyclin partners, positive and negative regulators, and downstream targets. The balance between CDK activation and inactivation determines whether cells proceed through G 1 into S phase, and from G 2 to M, through regulatory mechanisms that are conserved in more complex eukaryotes. The challenge is to expand our understanding of the basic cell cycle into a comprehensive regulatory network that incorporates environmental factors and coordinates cell division with growth, differentiation and tissue formation during development. Results from several studies indicate a critical role for CKI-1 , a CDK inhibitor of the Cip/Kip family, in the temporal control of cell division, potentially acting downstream of heterochronic genes and dauer regulatory pathways.
-
[
WormBook,
2006]
The C. elegans genome encodes many RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) with diverse functions in development, indicative of extensive layers of post-transcriptional control of RNA metabolism. A number of C. elegans RBPs have been identified by forward or reverse genetics. They tend to display tissue-specific mutant phenotypes, which underscore their functional importance. In addition, several RBPs that bind regulatory sequences in the 3'' untranslated regions of mRNAs have been identified molecularly. Most C. elegans RBPs are conserved throughout evolution, suggesting that their study in C. elegans may uncover new conserved biological functions. In this review, we primarily discuss RBPs that are associated with well-characterized mutant phenotypes in the germ line, the early embryo, or in somatic tissues. We also discuss the identification of RNA targets of RBPs, which is an important first step to understand how an RBP controls C. elegans development. It is likely that most RBPs regulate multiple RNA targets. Once multiple RNA targets are identified, specific features that distinguish target from non-target RNAs and the type(s) of RNA metabolism that each RBP controls can be determined. Furthermore, one can determine whether the RBP regulates all targets by the same mechanism or different targets by distinct mechanisms. Such studies will provide insights into how RBPs exert coordinate control of their RNA targets, thereby affecting development in a concerted fashion.
-
[
1992]
In vertebrates, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) are polymorphic enzymes presenting both globular and asymmetric forms. In invertebrates, only AChE has been characterized so far that presents a reduced molecular diversity. In insects for example the major molecular form of AChE is an amphiphilic dimeric form attached to the membrane through a glycolipid covalently linked at the C-terminus of each catalytic subunit. This AChE has a substrate specificity intermediate to those of mammalina AChE and BChE. A glycoplipid-anchored 7.5S from has also been observed in the trematode Schistosoma mansoni. Asymmetric forms have never been convincingly reported in invertebrates except in the more evolved animals such as Amphioxius. In the latter case also there is no BChE but AChE presents catalytic properties intermediate to those of vertebrate AChE and BChE. We are now interested in nematode AChE(s) for the following reasons: -several species are agricultural pest and it is important to get further informations on the target of potential nematicides; -it has been shown that at least three different genes code for AChE in Caenorhabditis elegans. It is therefore interesting to see whether the presence of multiple genes results in an increased molecular diversity, to define what are the structural characteristics of each gene product and finally to clone and sequence thee three genes for evolutionary relationships with the other members of the cholinesterase
-
[
WormBook,
2006]
Transposons are discrete segments of DNA capable of moving through the genome of their host via an RNA intermediate in the case of class I retrotransposon or via a "cut-and-paste" mechanism for class II DNA transposons. Since transposons take advantage of their host''s cellular machinery to proliferate in the genome and enter new hosts, transposable elements can be viewed as parasitic or "selfish DNA". However, transposons may have been beneficial for their hosts as genome evolution drivers, thus providing an example of molecular mutualism. Interactions between transposon and C. elegans research were undoubtedly mutualistic, leading to the advent of needed genomic tools to drive C. elegans research while providing insights into the transposition field. Tc1, the first C. elegans transposon to be identified, turned out to be the founding member of a widespread family of mobile elements: the Tc1/ mariner superfamily. The investigation into transposition regulation in C. elegans has uncovered an unforeseen link between transposition, genome surveillance and RNA interference. Conversely, transposons were utilized soon after their identification to inactivate and clone genes, providing some of the first molecular identities of C. elegans genes. Recent results suggest that transposons might provide a means to engineer site-directed mutations into the C. elegans genome. This article describes the different transposons present in the C. elegans genome with a specific emphasis on the ones that proved to be mobile under laboratory conditions. Mechanisms and control of transposition are discussed briefly. Some tools based on the use of transposons for C. elegans research are presented at the end of this review.
-
[
1987]
Vitellogenins of many insects, vertebrates, nematodes and sea urchins are very similar in size and amino acid composition. We have determined the nucleotide sequences of the genes that encode vitellogenins in nematodes (C. elegans) and sea urchins (S. purpuratus), and compared the deduced amino acid sequences to the published sequences of two vertebrate vitellogenins (X. laevis and G. gallus). This comparison demonstrated unequivocally that the nematode and vertebrate proteins are encoded by distant members of a single gene family. The less extensive sequence data available for the sea urchin gene indicates that this, too, may be a member of this family of genes, as may the vitellogenin genes of locust. On the other hand, we were unable to detect any similarity between these genes and the D. melanogaster yolk protein genes. Thus it appears that while nematodes, vertebrates, sea urchins and at least some insects utilize the same family of genes to encode vitellogenins, Drosophila uses a different gene family. All of the vitellogenin genes are regulated in a tissue-specific manner. They are expressed in the intestine in nematodes, in the liver in vertebrates, in the fat body in insects, and in the intestine and gonad in sea urchins. Their production is limited to adult females in all species except sea urchins, in which they are expressed by adults of both sexes. In nematodes we have identified two heptameric sequence elements repeated multiple times in all eleven of the vitellogenin genes sequenced. One of these elements is also present in the vertebrate promoters and has recently been shown to be required for transcriptional activation. All of the 5' ends of the vitellogenin mRNAs of nematodes, vertebrates and locust can be folded into potentially-stable secondary structures. We present evidence that these structures have been strongly selected for and presumably perform some function in regulation of vitellogenin production.