The anatomical basis of the C. elegans locomotor circuit is well known. Movement is initiated by command interneurons in the head and tail of the worm. These neurons activate the cholinergic motor neurons, which generate excitatory inputs to the muscle while simultaneously activating GABA motor neurons to inhibit the contralateral muscle. However, several open questions remain, such as which kind of neurotransmission occurs between the interneurons and the cholinergic motor neurons? How do the motor neurons of the locomotor circuit communicate with one another to coordinate the propagation of the sinusoidal wave? We have recently reported the identification of a neuronal acetylcholine receptor that is expressed and functions in the cholinergic motor neurons to maintain their excitability (Stawicki et al. & Qi et al. abstracts in C. elegans Neural Topic Meeting 2008, and Jospin et al. unpublished). This AChR is composed of three a-subunits, UNC-38, UNC-63, ACR-12, and one non-a subunit, ACR-2. A gain of function mutant,
acr-2(
n2420), exhibits spontaneous contraction, partially resembling the classical "Shrinker" behavior caused by the loss of GABA motor neuron function. Because the command interneurons of the locomotor circuit do not release acetylcholine, we propose that the ACR-2 receptor may act to coordinate the communication between the motor neurons themselves. To test this idea and define the signaling pathway of the ACR-2 receptor in the locomotor circuit, we have examined the genetic interactions between genes regulating synaptic transmission and
acr-2(
n2420). We find that blocking neuropeptide release by a loss of function mutation in
unc-31 significantly suppresses the behavior of
acr-2(
n2420) worms, whereas a mutation leading to a reduction in classical fast neurotransmission, or in gap junction function, was not able to suppress
acr-2(
n2420). Using cell-type specific expression studies, we find that this effect of neuropeptide signaling involves the action of
unc-31 in neurons, but not in the cholinergic motor neurons. Restoring
unc-31 function in motor neurons only can further suppress
acr-2(
n2420) behavior. Furthermore, we observed opposing effects on
acr-2(
n2420) behavior by the peptide processing pathway proteins
egl-3 and
egl-21. These observations suggest the modulation of ACR-2 receptor activity likely involves both excitatory and inhibitory peptide action. We are in the process of testing candidate peptides and receptors. Lastly, we have identified a novel suppressor of
acr-2(
n2420) that appears to define a potentially new calcium pathway in the motor neurons.