The execution of learned behaviors may be triggered by contextual information, consisting of environmental cues or the internal state of the organism. State-dependent learning refers to the ability of an organism to more effectively execute learned behaviors if the organism experiences internal contextual influences similar to those experienced when the learning occurred. Such contexts can be pharmacologically manipulated by treating with cholinergic compounds, opiates, cocaine and amphetamines, and with neurodepressants such as ethanol and barbituates1. Worms become intoxicated by ethanol in a manner similar to that of most other organisms tested (see abstracts by A. Davies and H. Kim, this meeting). We have sought to study the mechanisms of ethanol-induced state-dependent learning in worms. Olfactory adaptation in C. elegans is a decrease in the chemotaxis response to an odorant as a result of prior exposure to the odorant2. We demonstrate a form of state-dependent learning in worms by pairing olfactory adaptation and ethanol administration. Ethanol does not interfere with olfactory adaptation, however, worms exposed to an odorant while being treated with ethanol will only show subsequent adaptation to the odorant if ethanol is again administered during chemotaxis testing. If the odorant is presented without ethanol during testing, the animals behave as nave animals and therefore fail to alter their behavior based on their previous experience or prior exposure to the odorant. Further, we demonstrate that the state-dependent effects of ethanol require normal dopaminergic function. The dopamine-defective
cat-14 and
cat-25 mutants are able to adapt to volatile odorants, however, they do not show state-dependency when they are adapted to volatile odorants while intoxicated by ethanol. These results suggest that C. elegans is capable of a form of learning and indicate a conserved role of dopamine in the modulation of behavioral responses to ethanol. 1 Izquierdo. in Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (eds Lynch, McGaugh, and Wienberger) 333 (Guilford, New York, 1984). 2 Shulz, Sosnik, Ego, Haidarliu and Ahissar (2000) Nature 403, 549, and references therein. 3 Colbert and Bargmann (1995) Neuron 14, 803. 4 Duerr et al. (1999) J. Neuroscience 19, 72. 5 Lints and Emmons (1999) Development 126, 5819.