Integration of sensory signals and neuronal plasticity are essential steps for informational processing in the nervousl system. Animals sense many environmental stimuli simultaneously, and these sensory signals are modulated depending on their experiences and environment to generate a proper response. To elucidate its molecular mechanisms, we study a
hen-1(
ut236) mutant, which was originally identified as a mutant defective in interaction of two sensory signals. C. elegans move toward attractive odorants and avoid aversive Cu 2+ ion. In our paradigm, worms must cross aversive Cu 2+ ion barrier to reach attractive odorants, and their behavior varies with the concentration of both stimuli. In this assay,
hen-1 prefers to avoid Cu 2+ ions rather than to move toward the attractive odorants, although the dose responses to odorants and to Cu 2+ are indistinguishable from those of wild type. This phenotype suggests that
hen-1 has defects in the integration of two sensory signals but not in the chemosensation. Positional cloning reveals that the
hen-1 gene encodes a novel secretory protein with an LDL-ligand binding motif and is expressed in ASE and AIY neurons. Immunohistochemical studies showed that HEN-1 is localized in their processes at the nerve ring and their cell bodies in wild type animals, but it is not transported to the processes and mislocalized to cell bodies in the
unc-104 mutant in which synaptic vesicles are not transported. By using cell type specific promoters, we found that the HEN-1 functions cell nonautonomously in the nervous system. In addition, the expression of the HEN-1 in embryonic stage is not sufficient for the rescue, but expression in the late larval or adult stage is. This result suggests that it is necessary for functions in the mature neuronal circuit, but not for development of the nervous system. The
hen-1 mutant has also defects in two types of behavioral plasticity induced by paired sensory stimuli. Wild type animals conditioned with NaCl and starvation change their behavior to avoid NaCl, but
hen-1 shows weak behavioral change after conditioning. In another paradigm, wild type animals cultivated with food migrate to the cultivated temperature, but, after starvation, they change their behavior to avoid the temperature (see abstract by Mohri et al.). The
hen-1 mutant shows normal thermotaxis in well-fed condition, but, unlike wild type animals,
hen-1 conditioned with starvation at a cultivated temperature does not change their behavior to avoid the temperature (Aho phenotype). These defects in learning can be rescued by the wild type
hen-1 transgene. Although, in these paradigms, worms are conditioned with starvation and other stimuli, we cannot find any abnormality in behavioral change induced by sole starvation. These results suggest that the HEN-1 controls neuromodulation of sensory signals and, as a result, it affects integration of these signals and learning induced by paired stimuli.