In the previous newsletter, we described the use of X-linked hypomorphs to provide a genetic assay for X-chromosome expression. We have used them to examine the effects of four mutants on X-chromosome expression. Mutations in two autosomal genes,
dpy-21 V and
dpy-26 IV, lead to abnormally high expression of the X, based on their ability to suppress the hypomorphs. Three alleles of
dpy-21 do not differ appreciably in suppression, whereas the maternal (and presumed null) allele of
dpy-26,
n199 is a much stronger suppressor of the hypomorphs than the non-maternal allele
ct14. We also reported that the X-linked gene
dpy-22 is an apparent enhancer of the hypomorphs. None of the three dpy genes affects autosomal hypomorphs or null alleles of X- linked genes. From this, we postulate that
dpy-21 and
dpy-26 are negative regulators of X-expression and that
dpy-22 is a positive regulator. We had shown previously that duplications of the X can interact with
dpy-21; in particular, a
dpy-21 XO animal with a large X duplication may be a Dpy intersex. There are at least two possible explanations for this: 1) the duplication turns on
dpy-21 in some manner, for example by supplying an X-linked inducer; or 2) The duplication competes with the normal X for something that represses X-chromosome expression, and this effect is more evident when
dpy-21 is mutant. To distinguish these hypotheses, we looked at the effect of the large X- duplication mnDp25 on a hypomorph it does not cover,
lin-15(
n767), in
dpy-21+ strains. The duplication suppresses the hypomorph, albeit somewhat weakly, suggesting that X-duplications increase overall X expression by titrating an X repressor. One candidate for this postulated X repressor is
dpy-26. Thus, the
dpy-21 product may not interact with the X at all. We are testing other X-duplications, both singly and in combinations, to see if this effect is limited to mnDp25. We are also asking how
dpy-26(null) XO animals are affected by X duplications.