The activity patterns of somatic transgenes provide a means to study gene silencing in C. elegans. Transgene silencing phenomena have been observed in a variety of organisms, and are often associated with repeated structures. It has been found in C. elegans that certain transgenes present in long tandem arrays are silenced or show mosaic expression (i.e. many cells contain the transgene but lack detectable expression). Silencing can be relieved when the constructs are in a non-repetitive context: in F1 assays or imbedded in arrays with excess of genomic carrier DNA (1). In order to identify components of a silencing mechanism we have performed two types of mutagenesis screens. In one screen, we started with lines which contain a silenced gfp transgene and screened for a de-silenced phenotype. In another screen, we started with a line which contains a transgene that uniformly expresses in body wall muscle and screened for a reduction or a loss of expression. From the latter screen, we had identified a chromosomal mutation, tentatively designated tandem-array-modifier-1(
tam-1), in which the expression of gfp was greatly reduced when compared to the original strain (thanks to Steve Kostas). Tam-1 has similar effects on a number of other reporter transgenes expressed in both muscle and non-muscle tissue. There is a temporal component to
tam-1 effects: with all transgenes tested, expression is reduced in older
tam-1 mutant animals with no obvious difference in embryos or early larval stages. Our
tam-1 mutations are allelic to a set of mutations (called
grt-1/slm-1) that have been characterized by Jing Liu and Chieh Chang in Paul Sternberg's lab (2, 3). They have shown that there is a subtle effect on several endogenous genes that are active in larval or adult stages. In molecular analysis, we have shown that
tam-1 encodes a RING finger-containing protein of predicted molecular weight 107kd. RING finger containing-proteins have been implicated in a variety of processes such as DNA repair and recombination and transcriptional repression in development. Preliminary localization studies show that a
tam-1::gfp fusion construct is localized to the nucleus of adult somatic cells. The gfp is undetectable in embryos and larval stages. We are in the process of making an antibody to TAM-1. The role of
tam-1 is somewhat of a mystery. We are currently testing two possibilities: 1) TAM-1 plays a role in stimulating the activity of some genes in certain types of chromosomal contexts [e.g. repetitive arrays] 2) TAM-1 is a time-specific regulator of gene expression and plays a general role in gene activity in later life stages.