Mutation in the
clk-1 locus disrupts the normal temporal control of a wide range of developmental and behavioral events; see Wong et al., Genetics 139:1247-1259 (1995). Perhaps fittingly for
clk-1, progress towards the gene's cloning has been slow (
wm93p124; ecwm94p77). Injection of cosmid pools spanning the candidate region has failed to produce rescue. RFLP mapping has been hampered by an apparent paucity of polymorphisms between N2, RC301 and RW7000 strains in the region. The strategy of refining the likely position of
clk-1 by locating the left- and right-flanking genes
dpy-17 and
lon-1 has also proved problematic. Extensive Southern analyses have failed to reveal any allele-specific polymorphisms (thanks to Cathy Savage for
lon-1 strains). Further, for
lon-1, the usual co-injectable marker pRF4 on its own gives phenotypic rescue (wild-type length rollers; presumed to be a indirect effect), while arrays covering the supposed location of
dpy-17 produce a dominant Dpy effect, potentially confounding detection of any rescue. A 32P non-complementation screen has generated new alleles of
clk-1,
dpy-17 and
lon-1. These will be used in another round of Southern analyses in the hope of uncovering allele-specific polymorphisms. One positive lead that we are pursuing involves
gro-1(
e2400); see
wbg11#5p60; ecmw92p5. The
gro-1 locus lies close to
clk-1; by scoring Sma non Dpy in the six factor cross
dpy-17(
e164)gro- 1
(e2400)
sma-4(
e729)/
unc-79(
e1030)
clk-1(
e2519)
lon-1(
e185) it has been positioned 0.03 cM (approx. 15 kb) to the left of
clk-1. Two spontaneous mutants (
bli-1(
qm49) II and
dpy-7(
qm63) V) have been recovered from
gro-1 strains, implicating the activity of a transposon which may be directly associated with the
gro-1 mutation. As
dpy-7 has been cloned, this may give us an indirect route to speed the cloning of both
gro-1 and
clk-1. The progress towards identifying
clk-1,
gro-1,
dpy-17 and
lon-1 will be reported.