The HSNs, a pair of serotoninergic neurons, innervate the vulval muscles and drive egg-laying. The HSNs are born and migrate during embryogenesis, but do not differentiate into functional neurons until adulthood. The differentiated phenotypes of the HSNs that we monitor are (l) a change in morphology as visualized with Nomarski optics, termed hood formation, at approximately the time of the L3 molt; (2) axonal outgrowth; and (3) serotonin expression. We hope to understand how the timing of HSN differentiation is controlled and how the decision to differentiate leads to the expression of the differentiated phenotype. Mutations in several genes disrupt normal HSN differentation. Precocious or retarded mutations in the heterochronic genes cause the precocious or retarded onset of HSN differentiation (G. Garriga, WBG 11(2):101,1990). Furthermore, mutations in three other genes,
unc-86,
sem4 and
egl45, block the expression of all three differentiated phenotypes of the HSNs. It seems likely that
unc-86, which encodes a putative transcription factor, functions directly in regulating the expression of genes required for differentiation, since the temperature-sensitive period for
unc-86 in controlling HSN development is at the time of HSN differentiation (M. Finney, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 1987) and since
unc-86 protein is expressed in the HSNs at that time ( Finney and Ruvkun, Cell 63:895, 1990). To understand how
egl45 and
sem4 act to control HSN differentiation, we are characterizing them in both genetic and molecular studies. Our genetic studies have concentrated on
sem4. We have identified seven
sem4 alleles which define three phenotypic classes: weak (nl 378), strong (nl 971 and four others) and lethal (
n2088).
n2088 fails to complement a number of linked lethal complementation groups and is therefore probably a deficiency; we are currently testing whether
n2088 spans
sem4. Strong
sem4 alleles affect many other cells in addition to the HSNs, including those of the nervous system, musculature and hypcderm. Staining experiments using antibodies directed against the
unc-86 protein have shown that the pattern of unc- 86 expression is altered in
sem4 mutant animals (M. Finney, personal communication), suggesting that
sem4 controls the expression of this putative transcription factor in some cells. For example, mutation of
sem4 blocks the increase in
unc-86 expression observed in the HSNs at the time of their differentiation. Since
unc-86 is expressed only in neurons, however, the function of
sem4 in non-neuronal cells presumably does not involve
unc-86 but could involve other cell type- specific transcription factors. Our efforts to clone
egl45 and
sem4 have been greatly aided by the fact that both genes lie within mapped contigs. We have rescued both mutants in germline transformation experiments.
egl45 is rescued by an 8 kb subclone of the cosmid T17D7 from the cluster on LG III.
sem4 is rescued by the overlapping cosmids E02H2 and C09F2 from the cluster on LG I. Experiments in which both of these cosmids were injected together suggests that the complete
sem4 gene includes DNA both to the left and to the right of the 18 kb region of overlap between the two cosmids. We are now attempting to identify transcripts and cDNAs corresponding to
egl45 and
sem4.