All life must defend itself against pathogens. C. elegans does not have an adaptive immune system and homologues of key components of the conserved innate immune Toll pathway are missing from its genome, so how does this animal cope with pathogens? To address this question, we are using forward genetic analysis to identify the molecular components of the worm's response to a bacterial infection caused by the host specific bacterium, Microbacterium nematophilum. Worms that come into contact with M. nem. become constipated, develop a swelling of the post-anal region (the Deformed anal region phenotype) and exhibit a reduced growth rate. Previous screens using EMS mutagenesis and
mut-7 activation of endogenous transposons have demonstrated that over 20 loci can be mutated to inhibit the swelling response to M. nem. These loci were named bus for bacterially unswollen. We used Mos1 transposon mutagenesis to molecularly identify 4 additional bus loci. Mos1 insertions in four loci,
tax-4,
egl-8,
bus-19 and
bus-20, independently correlate with a reduction in the swelling response to M. nem.. Much work has been done to investigate
tax-4 and
egl-8 function in the worm, but their role in pathogen-induced anal swelling is not easily interpreted.
bus-19 and
bus-20 define loci which have not been previously characterised.
bus-19 is predicted to encode a highly conserved transmembrane protein.
bus-20 is predicted to encode a galactosyltransferase in the Glycosyltransferase 31 family. Other members of this family include
bre-5 and
bre-2, which have been shown to be required for Cry5B pore-forming toxin susceptibility [1, 2]. An initial analysis of these four bus mutants suggests that the corresponding genes are involved in setting up or maintaining cuticle properties of the worm (e.g.
bus-19,
bus-20), in signaling the swelling response (e.g.
egl-8), or possibly in both processes (e.g.
tax-4). More information about these bus genes will be presented at the meeting. 1.Griffitts, J.S., et al.,Science, 2001. 293(5531): p. 860-4. 2.Marroquin, L.D., et al., Genetics, 2000. 155(4): p. 1693-9.