C. elegans postembryonic development is characterised by four discrete larval stages. The transitions between larval stages entail a series of events including the formation of a new cuticle and escape from the old one, cessation of pharyngeal pumping and behavioral quiescence. The entire process is called molting and robust waves of gene expression cycle with these processes. These events are used as hallmarks to study the timing of the developmental process, typically, by visual inspection. This method is time consuming and unsuitable for screening large numbers of animals.We have applied a method based on bioluminescence to measure the alternation of larval stages and molts, extracting information about the duration of each stage of development. We have validated this method with a
lin-42 mutant that shows slower development than wild-type animals (1) and with a
daf-2 mutant that shows an extended second larval stage (2).Development in C. elegans is controlled by genetic and environmental factors. Temperature regulates the speed of embryonic and post-embryonic development in many ectothermic organisms. The effect of temperature on embryonic development in C. elegans and Drosophila (3, 4), and on postembryonic development in Drosophila (3) have been described. However, a detailed analysis of larval developmental at different temperatures has never been shown for C. elegans. We have determined the duration of each molt and each larval stage at temperatures between 10.3 C and 27.5 C. The speed of development increases with temperature in a non-linear manner. At low temperatures, the duration of development follows the Arrhenius equation. At higher temperatures, the speed of development deviates from Arrhenius. Furthermore, we have show that this difference stems mainly from the molts. We are currently investigating the implication of thermosensory pathways in the control of developmental speed.1. Monsalve, Van Buskirk and Frand, Current Biology 21, 2033-2045 (2011).2. Ruaud, Katic and Bessereau, Genetics 187, 337-343 (2011).3. Powsner, Physiological Zoology 8, 474-520 (1935).4. Begasse, et al., Cell Reports 10, 647-653 (2015).