C. elegans possesses a highly diverse repertoire of 283 genes encoding C-type lectin-like domain proteins (clec genes). Since vertebrate C-type lectin receptors have characterized functions in defense responses against pathogens and since expression of C. elegans clec genes is pathogen-dependent, it is generally assumed that clec genes function in C. elegans defense responses. However, the exact function of most C. elegans clec genes remains unknown. Here, we focused on the C. elegans clec gene
clec-4, whose expression is highly upregulated upon infection with various pathogens and asked whether
clec-4 and the encoded protein function in the C. elegans defense response. We tested the involvement of
clec-4 in the defense response to infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14, Bacillus thuringiensis BT18247, and the natural pathogen Serratia rubidaea MYb339. Against our expectations
clec-4(
ok2050) mutant worms were as susceptible as wildtype worms to infection with PA14 and MYb339 and even more resistant to infection with BT18247 (BT). To explore potential redundant function between different clec genes we focused our genetic analyses on the
clec-4 paralogs
clec-41 and
clec-42 that are coexpressed with
clec-4. Genetic analyses revealed that
clec-41 and
clec-42 do not function redundantly to
clec-4. However,
clec-41 and
clec-42 have redundant, but unequal roles in the defense response to BT infection. Moreover, we found that
clec-4 genetically interacts with
clec-41 and
clec-42. In agreement with the results of the genetic analyses recombinant CLEC-41 and CLEC-42 proteins were able to bind bacteria in vitro, while the CLEC-4 protein was not. To investigate if
clec-4 plays a regulatory role in the C. elegans defense response to BT infection, we did a transcriptome analysis of the response of
clec-4(
ok2050) mutant and wildtype worms to BT infection using RNA sequencing. We found that in the absence of pathogenic BT the genes differentially expressed between
clec-4 mutants and wildtype worms were all downregulated. In contrast, in the presence of pathogenic BT, genes differentially expressed between
clec-4 mutant and wildtype worms were both down- and up-regulated. Within the
clec-4-dependent gene sets were infection response genes, such as other clec genes,
irg-1, lys, and ilys genes. Through enrichment analyses using WormExp we found a significant overlap between the genes positively regulated by
clec-4 with genes up-regulated by ageing and between genes negatively regulated by
clec-4 with targets of insulin-like receptor/DAF-2 signaling. Our results suggest that CLEC-41 and CLEC-42 function in the C. elegans defense response, directly binding to pathogens, while
clec-4 plays an as yet undefined regulatory role. We are currently further evaluating the link between
clec-4 and ILR/DAF-2 signaling.