The
gld-1 gene is involved in multiple aspects of C. elegans germline development. The primary, essential function of
gld-1 is to direct oogenesis. In the absence of
gld-1 activity, germ cells that would otherwise develop into oocytes enter meiosis normally but exit early pachytene to re-enter a mitotic cell cycle and form a tumor. The gene also plays nonessential roles in inhibiting premeiotic germ cell proliferation and promoting germ cells to adopt the male sexual fate [1,2].
gld-1 encodes a 463 amino acid protein that contains an evolutionarily conserved domain of ~200 amino acids that is also found in the mammalian Quaking and Sam68 proteins. A KH RNA binding motif lies within this domain [3]. Since GLD-1 appears to be localized exclusively to the cytoplasm, the protein is likely to regulate mRNA translation or stability [4]. To better understand how
gld-1 acts in the control of germline development, we are using the yeast two-hybrid system [5] to isolate proteins that physically associate with the gene product. Through this approach we hope to identify regulators and cofactors of GLD-1. By screening an oligo(dT)-primed cDNA library (gift of R. Barstead) with a fragment of GLD-1 that includes the amino terminal half of the conserved domain, we identified the F28E10.1 gene product as a protein that specifically binds GLD-1. The F28E10.1 locus, which was identified by the C. elegans genome sequencing consortium, is predicted to encode a novel, hydrophilic protein of 118 kD. This gene maps to the region of chromosome IV that is deleted by mDf4 and may correspond to one of the lethal or sterile loci uncovered by the deficiency [6,7]. We are currently testing the biological relevance of the interaction between GLD-1 and F28E10.1 through in vivo assays. Progress will be reported. [1] Francis et al. 1995a. Genetics 139: 579-606; [2] Francis et al. 1995b. Genetics 139: 607-630; [3] Jones and Schedl. 1995. Genes Dev 9: 1491-1504; [4] Jones et al., in preparation; [5] Chien et al. 1991. PNAS 88: 9578-9582; [6] Rogalski and Riddle. 1988. Genetics 118: 61-74; [7] Cassada et al. 1981. Dev Biol 84: 193-205.