The response to gentle touch in Caenorhabditis elegans requires the activity of at least twelve touch function genes. Among them,
mec-4 and
mec-10 are likely to encode subunits of a mechanosensitive channel; they belong to the DEG/ENaC ion-channel superfamily, and dominant mutations in them cause degeneration of the touch cells. Since
mec-4 and
mec-10 -induced degenerations are completely suppressed by mutations in
mec-6, wild type MEC-6 protein is essential for this degenerin channel activity. Also, mutations in
mec-6 suppress the degenerations caused by
deg-1 ,
unc-8 and partially suppress the hypercontraced phenotype of
unc-105 dominant mutation. Thus,
mec-6 is more generally required for degenerin channel function. We have cloned
mec-6 gene and had earlier reported that it encodes a predicted protein of 377 amino acids with limited sequence similarity to the mammalian enzyme paraoxonase.
mec-6 is widely expressed in many cell types including the touch receptor neurons consistent with its requirement for functioning of different degenerins. MEC-6 is a type II transmembrane protein with a single N-terminal transmembrane domain and a large extracellular C-terminal tail. MEC-6 is glycosylated when synthesized in vitro in presence of microsomes. We have now confirmed the predicted topology and subcellular localization of MEC-6 by expressing it in cultured cells. MEC-6 was tagged with HA epitope at the C-terminal end and was transiently transfected into CHO cells. Immunostaining of the non-permeablized cells with anti-HA antibodies revealed surface expression of MEC-6, which appears as discrete dots that are reminiscent of lipid rafts/caveolae. Punctate pattern of expression was also seen in C. elegans when the rescuing
mec-6::gfp or the full-length
mec-4::gfp constructs were injected. In case of
mec-6::gfp , expression in neuronal processes is weak and hence only a few dots could be discerned, but the punctate expression was very clear in body wall muscle cells. Using the two color variants of GFP, we have shown that MEC-6 and MEC-4 are colocalized; coinjection of ectopically expressing
mec-4::cfp fusion construct under the control of
myo-3 promoter along with
mec-6::yfp resulted in overlapping punctate expression in body wall muscle. Furthermore, coinjection of full-length
mec-4::yfp with P
mec-4 cfp into wild type worms resulted in uniform expression of CFP and punctate expression of YFP along the entire length of all the touch cell processes. However, when the two constructs were introduced into
mec-6 mutants, the punctate expression of YFP was totally abolished whereas the CFP expression from
mec-4 promoter was unaffected. Thus, MEC-6 affects the stability and/or localization of MEC-4 protein, but not the transcription of the
mec-4 gene. Since
u3 allele of
mec-6 also partially suppresses the hypercontracted phenotype of dominant mutation in
unc-105 (a muscle-specific degenerin), we are testing to see if MEC-6 colocalizes with UNC-105. We have expressed epitope tagged MEC-4 (with FLAG), MEC-6 (with HA) and MEC-10 (with MYC) in CHO cells to study the interactions among these proteins. Immunoprecipitation of MEC-6 pulls down both MEC-4 and MEC-10. Similarly, immunoprecipitation of MEC-10 coprecipitates both MEC-4 and MEC-6 thereby demonstrating that all the three proteins physically interact with one another. In addition, MEC-4 and MEC-10 form amiloride-sensitive Na + channels in Xenopus oocytes only when coexpressed with either MEC-6 or MEC-2, a stomatin-like protein (see the abstract by Goodman et al.). These results taken together suggest that MEC-6 either function as a channel subunit and/or is required for clustering of the channel complexes into discrete microdomains of the membrane.