Germline fate decisions include mitosis or meiosis, survival or death, and spermatogenesis or oogenesis. FBF-1 and FBF-2 (FBF), nearly identical proteins in the Puf family (for Pumilio and FBF), regulate the hermaphrodite sperm-oocyte switch by repressing the
fem-3 3'UTR (1). We now find that FBF also regulates germline proliferation. In fbf(dsRNAi) and
fbf-1 fbf-2 double mutants, all germline cells enter meiosis and differentiate as sperm. Genetic experiments place fbf upstream of the
gld-1 gld-2 control over meiosis. In
gld-1 gld-2 double mutants, all germline cells remain mitotic (2); the same is true of
fbf-1 fbf-2;
gld-1 gld-2 quadruple mutants. Experiments to determine the regulatory relationships between fbf and
glp-1 are in progress. In addition, we have found that
fog-1 , which originally was identified by its role in sperm specification (3), also plays a role in germline proliferation. Therefore, FBF and FOG-1 provide key links between controls of proliferation and sex determination. Using two-hybrid screens with FBF as bait, we identified NOS-3. The C. elegans genome harbors three nanos homologs. NOS-3 interacts specifically with both FBF-1 and FBF-2, but NOS-1 or NOS-2 do not interact with either. To explore the functions of the three NOS proteins, we used RNAi and isolation of a
nos-3 deletion mutant to show that the three nos genes influence the sperm/oocyte switch, and also all three are required for germline survival. The nos effect on germline survival does not require
ced-3 , and therefore is unlikely to trigger the programmed cell death pathway. In contrast to the nos genes, fbf is not required for germline survival. Therefore, FBF and NOS act together for the sperm/oocyte switch, but have distinct roles in germline proliferation (FBF) and survival (NOS). We propose that distinct partners target FBF and other Puf proteins to different mRNAs, which in turn leads to diverse biological outcomes. 1. Zhang and Gallegos et al. (1997) Nature 390, 477-484. 2. Kadyk and Kimble (1998) Development 125, 1803-1813. 3. Barton and Kimble (1990) Genetics 125, 29-39.