C. elegans senses environmental cues such as pheromone, temperature and food, and develops accordingly into a reproductive adult or a dauer larva. The decision as to which developmental path is followed is controlled in part by a TGF signaling pathway.The components of the TGF signaling pathway in C. elegans include a ligand encoded by
daf-7, two receptors encoded by
daf-1 and
daf-4 and transcription factors encoded by
daf-8,
daf-14 and
daf-3. Another identified component of the pathway is DAF-5, which is antagonized by the TGF pathway and which was cloned in our lab (see abstract by Da Graca et al. this program).C. briggsae is a nematode worm morphologically and developmentally almost identical to C. elegans. The two species have diverged 20-100 MYA. When comparing the amino acid sequence of C. elegans DAF-5 and its C. briggsae ortholog, we have noticed a surprisingly low identity of only about 40%. To determine whether this low percent identity is a property of DAF-5 alone, or perhaps a group of TGF/dauer genes, we looked at the sequence conservation between C. elegans and C. briggsae in the following groups of genes: TGF dauer pathway, TGF body size pathway, insulin mediated pathway, other dauer genes, and a group of randomly selected genes.We have found that the weak sequence conservation between C. elegans and C. briggase genes was not specific to DAF-5 alone, and all the genes in the TGF dauer pathway share this property with the average of 41% identity. In contrast to this group, we have found that all of the genes in the TGF body size pathway are very highly conserved, with the exception of DAF-4, which acts in both the body size and the dauer TGF pathways. Excluding DAF-4 from the TGF body size group, the average percent identity is 84.6. The genes in the insulin mediated pathway and other dauer genes show a greater range of values, and their average percent identities are 72.2 and 79.2 respectively. The group of randomly selected genes gives an average of 77.5% identity. All possible pairwise comparisons of these groups show that only the genes in the TGF dauer pathway are significantly different from all the other groups.To further determine the signs of positive, negative, or neutral selection acting on individual genes in the TGF dauer pathway, we are taking a closer look at the conservation of individual functional domains of these genes.