Throughout the animal kingdom, neuropeptide signaling mediates many survival-promoting behaviors such as foraging and the escape response. In C. elegans, members of two of the largest neuropeptide gene families, flp and nlp, bind to their cognate frpr and npr-encoding receptors to regulate many aspects of nematode behavior and physiology. However, the expression and function of several neuropeptide G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in C. elegans still remain unknown. Here, we characterize 21 frpr and npr neuropeptide GPCRs with no pre-existing reagents and discover a conserved behavioral role for the interneuron neuropeptide receptor FRPR-14. We systematically screened 21 CRISPR-generated GPCR null mutants using two behavioral paradigms, the posterior light touch-induced response and freely-moving locomotion tracking assays. Although half of the receptor mutants screened had at least one phenotype, we found that only the
frpr-14 mutant was defective in both. A
frpr-14 GFP reporter is expressed in the AVJ and AIB interneurons, both of which are presynaptic to several command interneurons. However, only AVJ-specific
frpr-14 cDNA expression was sufficient to rescue the full repertoire of mutant phenotypes suggesting a broader behavioral role for AVJ compared to AIB. To identify FRPR-14's ligand in these behavioral contexts, we first screened all available flp mutants for visible motility defects. Following up with genetic epistasis analysis, we find FLP-3 to be a potential ligand for FRPR-14. We next applied a comparative approach by studying the orthologous
Cbr-frpr-14 in Caenorhabditis briggsae. A
Cbr-frpr-14 GFP reporter is expressed in a single pair of C. brigggsae interneurons with strikingly similar morphology and relative anatomical position as the C. elegans AVJ neurons. While cross-species C. elegans AVJ-specific expression of
Cbr-frpr-14 cDNA rescued all mutant phenotypes, a
Cbr-frpr-14 null mutant was only defective in the posterior light touch-induced response. Although FRPR-14's function at the cellular level is evolutionarily-conserved, the less evident conservation at the organismal level might be due to differing ligand expression patterns and/or neural architecture between species. Our results provide a framework for further studies on the evolution and function of neuropeptide signaling networks between two closely-related, genetically tractable species.