Legouis R, Chang JT, O'Rourke EJ, Sato K, Lapierre LR, Kumsta C, Guo B, Zhang H, Wu F, Lin L, Melendez A, Kovacs AL, Hansen M, Lu Q, Jia K, Wang X, Sato M
[
Autophagy,
2015]
The cellular recycling process of autophagy has been extensively characterized with standard assays in yeast and mammalian cell lines. In multicellular organisms, numerous external and internal factors differentially affect autophagy activity in specific cell types throughout the stages of organismal ontogeny, adding complexity to the analysis of autophagy in these metazoans. Here we summarize currently available assays for monitoring the autophagic process in the nematode C. elegans. A combination of measuring levels of the lipidated Atg8 ortholog LGG-1, degradation of well-characterized autophagic substrates such as germline P granule components and the SQSTM1/p62 ortholog SQST-1, expression of autophagic genes and electron microscopy analysis of autophagic structures are presently the most informative, yet steady-state, approaches available to assess autophagy levels in C. elegans. We also review how altered autophagy activity affects a variety of biological processes in C. elegans such as L1 survival under starvation conditions, dauer formation, aging, and cell death, as well as neuronal cell specification. Taken together, C. elegans is emerging as a powerful model organism to monitor autophagy while evaluating important physiological roles for autophagy in key developmental events as well as during adulthood.
[
Dev Biol,
2008]
One of the challenges to understanding nervous system development has been to establish how a fairly limited number of axon guidance cues can set up the patterning of very complex nervous systems. Studies on organisms with relatively simple nervous systems such as Drosophila melanogaster and C. elegans have provided many insights into axon guidance mechanisms. The axons of many neurons migrate along both the dorsal-ventral axis (DV) and the anterior-posterior (AP) at different phases of development, and in addition they may also cross the midline. Axon migration in the dorsal-ventral (DV) direction is mainly controlled by Netrins with their receptors; UNC-40/DCC and UNC-5, and the Slits with their receptors; Robo/SAX-3. Axon guidance in the anterior-posterior (AP) axis is mainly controlled by Wnts with their receptors; the Frizzleds/Fz. An individual axon may be subjected to opposing attractive and repulsive forces coming from opposite sides in the same axis but there may also be opposing cues in the other axis of migration. All the information from the cues has to be integrated within the growth cone at the leading edge of the migrating axon to elicit a response. Recent studies have provided insight into how this is achieved. Evidence suggests that the axis of axon migration is determined by the manner in which Netrin, Slit and Wnt receptors are polarized (localized) within the neuron prior to axon outgrowth. The same molecules are involved in both axon outgrowth and axon guidance, for at least some neurons in C. elegans, whether the cue is the attractive cue UNC-6/Netrin working though UNC-40/DCC or the repulsive cue SLT-1/Slit working though the receptor SAX-3/Robo (Adler et al., 2006, Chang et al., 2006, Quinn et al., 2006, 2008). The molecules involved in cell signaling in this case are polarized within the cell body of the neuron before process outgrowth and direct the axon outgrowth. Expression of the Netrin receptor UNC-40/DCC or the Slit receptor SAX-3/Robo in axons that normally migrate in the AP direction causes neuronal polarity reversal in a Netrin and Slit independent manner (Levy-Strumpf and Culotti 2007, Watari-Goshima et al., 2007). Localization of the receptors in this case is caused by the kinesin-related VAB-8L which appears to govern the site of axon outgrowth in these neurons by causing receptor localization. Therefore, asymmetric localization of axon guidance receptors is followed by axon outgrowth in vivo using the receptor''s normal cue, either attractive, repulsive or unknown cues.