-
[
2010]
Over 30 years ago, Nobel laureate Sydney Brenner recognized that an intellectually straightforward strategy to delineate the basic principles in neurobiology is to utilize a model organism with a nervous system that is simple enough to lend itself to anatomical, cellular, genetic, and molecular analysis, yet be complex enough that lessons learned in that organism would give us insight into general principles of neural function. The humble organism he chose, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, is now one of the most thoroughly characterized metazoans, particularly in terms of its nervous system. One of Brenner's motivations in adapting C. elegans as a model organism was to understand the totality of the molecular and cellular basis for the control of animal behavior (Brener 1988). In this chapter, we review what is arguably the best-studied aspect of C. elegans behavior: response to chemical stimuli. The C. elegans neurobiology literature can be intimidating for the uninitiated; we attempt to limit the use of "worm jargon" in this review. For a more C. elegans-centric review, we refer you to other excellent sources (Bargmann 2006).
-
[
1980]
The free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has attracted attention in recent years as an organism for the study of the genetic control of development. This chapter briefly describes the present state of this work. Many of the studies reported on here have not yet been published but have been described in "The Worm Breeder's Gazette", an informal newsletter I edit, and at a C. elegans meeting held at Cold Spring Harbor in May 1979. A previous review of this field was written by Riddle (1978). The use of free-living nematodes in genetic studies was first suggested by Dougherty and Calhoun in 1948. Early studies of C. elegans by Dougherty and co-workers (1959) emphasized methods of axenic cultivation while the sexual cycle was described by Nigon (1949). The present interest in C. elegans, however, was triggered by Sydney Brenner who took up the organism in the late 1960s as a possibly useful organism for the study of the genetic control of the nervous system and of behavior (Brenner, 1973). It was largely due to Brenner (1974) that the present methods of cultivation and of genetic analysis were developed.
-
[
Methods Cell Biol,
1995]
Although Caenorhabditis elegans was originally chosen as a model organism for cell biology with serial section electron microscopy (EM) methods in mind, these methods have remained a daunting challenge. There is an apocryphal story that Nichol Thomson originally advised Sydney Brenner that C. elegans was unsuitable for electron microscopy and that Brenner should choose another species. Other experienced microscopists have probably shared similar dark thoughts from time to time. Nonetheless, the worm's very small size, simple organization, and cablelike nervous system have permitted Brenner's colleagues to characterize every cell and cell contact in the wild-type animal, potentiating the genetic characterization of cellular development in remarkable detail. We attempt to provide an adequate background for anyone to initiate EM studies of C. elegans. Two decades ago, as the first of Brenner's postdoctoral fellows left his laboratory to establish new worm laboratories, it was standard practice to include an EM component in their studies. Their combined efforts to characterize the adult animal's cell types and the essential steps in its development helped to erect a lovely scaffold of key manuscripts, capped by the description of the "Mind of the Worm" in some 600 micrographs and 175 drawings. Many of these works required technical heroics or suffered long delays before publication. Most people later chose to leave electron microscopy behind in pursuit of molecular quarry. The fruits of their molecular and genetic studies should soon stimulate a renewed flowering of electron microscopy. We hope to smooth your entry or reentry into these techniques. We also summarize our methods for three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction, based largely on film techniques introduced by John White and Randle Ware. Digital imaging techniques seem poised to make 3D reconstruction more accessible, and may simplify the exchange of morphological data between laboratories. We discuss several computer systems that the C. elegans community could adopt for high-resolution studies of structure and function. In addition, we briefly cover several specialized specimen preparation techniques for electron microscopy, including freeze fracture and electron microscopic immunocytochemistry.
-
[
1977]
The soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans was selected 11 years ago by Sydney Brenner as an experimental organism suitable for the isolation of many behavioral mutants and small enough for anatomical analysis of such mutants with the electron microscope. Two distinct goals motivated the initial studies of this organism: first, the hope that some of the mutants would have simple anatomical alterations that could be directly correlated with their behavioral defects, allowing the assignment of specific functions to specific neurons, and second, the hope that the detailed analysis of the kinds of alterations induced by individual mutations and the classes of cells affected by given mutations would reveal general features of the genetic program that specifies the development of the organism. Over the past 11 years the number of investigators working on C. elegans has increased to about 75 and is still growing. Nearly 3,000 different mutants have been isolated and different investigators are pursuing their effects on different cells. My own research is in the development of the nervous system. In particular, I would like to learn something about the workings of the complex black box that connects individual genes to the determination of the morphology of developing neurons. Are there gene products whose specific function is to determine the morphology of cells? If so, what are these gene products and how do they act in the developing cell? One would anticipate that mutations in such hypothetical genes would cause specific morphological alterations in cells. Because the morphology of a neuron determines its function, by selecting behavioral mutants altered in the function of the nervous system one might commonly find mutants that alter the morphology of neurons, and some of these might be in specific morphological genes. It is my hope that it will be possible to compare such mutants to the wild type in order to identify the defective gene products and thereby learn something about the role of normal gene products in determining the development of neurons. In this paper I will first summarize the results of several years' work on one specific class of mutants in the nematode, sensory mutants, work performed both in my laboratory and that of my colleagues Jim Lewis and Jonathan Hodgkin. Second, I will discuss frankly some of the difficulties and frustrations we have experienced in trying to interpret the effects of these specific mutants. Some of these difficulties illustrate problems endemic to genetic studies of development. Third, I will describe the more recent work performed in my labortory that is being directed toward genetic analysis of the structure and function of a