Neural plasticity, a remarkable feature of the nervous system, allows animals to adjust their behavior based on previous experience. C. elegans is able to modify its olfactory preference to avoid the odor of pathogenic bacteria after ingesting the pathogens [1]; this learning is regulated by a recently identified neural circuit as well as multiple signaling pathways [2-4]. The genetic accessibility and well-characterized nervous system of C. elegans provide a unique opportunity to study the molecular and cellular mechanisms of olfactory learning, which are often conserved from the nematode to higher organisms.
To characterize novel molecular regulators of C. elegans olfactory learning, we conducted a forward genetic screen for mutants with altered learning abilities. Using a high-throughput behavioral assay, we have identified several candidate mutants, among which one recessive allele displays significantly enhanced olfactory learning. This phenotype is not due to any detectable deficiency in innate immunity or olfactory preference under the naive condition. By whole genome sequencing and trangenic rescue, we have mapped the gene of interest
eol-1 (enhanced olfactory learning-1) to a predicted protein-coding sequence on Chromosome V. GFP reporter driven by the endogenous promoter of
eol-1 is expressed in the reproductive system and several identified neurons; neuron-specific expression of
eol-1 in the URX sensory neuron restores the learning phenotype in the mutant background. The protein encoded by
eol-1 is conserved in different Caenorhabditis species and other eukaryotes; its yeast ortholog Rai1 is involved in RNA metabolism, whereas the function of the mammalian ortholog DOM3Z remains unclear. Our ongoing work to identify genetic interaction of
eol-1 and to evaluate its function in C. elegans may contribute to better understanding the function of this conserved gene in more complex systems.
References: 1. Zhang et al. Nature 438, 179-184. 2. Ha et. al. Neuron 68, 1173-86. 3. Zhang and Zhang, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(42):17081-6. 4. Chen et. al. Neuron 77, 572-585.