[
2020]
Onchocerciasis, also known as the African river blindness, is the second most important cause of infectious blindness worldwide after trachoma. It is caused by the filarial nematode, <i>Onchocerca volvulus</i>, and transmitted by repeated bites of the vector, female black fly of the genus <i>Simulium damnosum</i>. The vector breeds in fast-flowing and oxygen-rich rivers in affected areas with transmission and disease prevalence usually stretching along these river basins and thereby the name river blindness.[1]Aside from blindness, onchocerciasis results in a troubling chronic dermatitis.[1]
[
1977]
The soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans was selected 11 years ago by Sydney Brenner as an experimental organism suitable for the isolation of many behavioral mutants and small enough for anatomical analysis of such mutants with the electron microscope. Two distinct goals motivated the initial studies of this organism: first, the hope that some of the mutants would have simple anatomical alterations that could be directly correlated with their behavioral defects, allowing the assignment of specific functions to specific neurons, and second, the hope that the detailed analysis of the kinds of alterations induced by individual mutations and the classes of cells affected by given mutations would reveal general features of the genetic program that specifies the development of the organism. Over the past 11 years the number of investigators working on C. elegans has increased to about 75 and is still growing. Nearly 3,000 different mutants have been isolated and different investigators are pursuing their effects on different cells. My own research is in the development of the nervous system. In particular, I would like to learn something about the workings of the complex black box that connects individual genes to the determination of the morphology of developing neurons. Are there gene products whose specific function is to determine the morphology of cells? If so, what are these gene products and how do they act in the developing cell? One would anticipate that mutations in such hypothetical genes would cause specific morphological alterations in cells. Because the morphology of a neuron determines its function, by selecting behavioral mutants altered in the function of the nervous system one might commonly find mutants that alter the morphology of neurons, and some of these might be in specific morphological genes. It is my hope that it will be possible to compare such mutants to the wild type in order to identify the defective gene products and thereby learn something about the role of normal gene products in determining the development of neurons. In this paper I will first summarize the results of several years' work on one specific class of mutants in the nematode, sensory mutants, work performed both in my laboratory and that of my colleagues Jim Lewis and Jonathan Hodgkin. Second, I will discuss frankly some of the difficulties and frustrations we have experienced in trying to interpret the effects of these specific mutants. Some of these difficulties illustrate problems endemic to genetic studies of development. Third, I will describe the more recent work performed in my labortory that is being directed toward genetic analysis of the structure and function of a