Notch-mediated lateral specification is utilized during the development of all animals to generate different cell fates from initially equivalent cells. The anchor cell (AC)/ventral uterine precursor (VU) cell fate decision is a simple lateral specification paradigm in which two initially equivalent cells interact via LIN-12/Notch such that one becomes the AC and one becomes the VU (reviewed in Greenwald 2012). Studies using this paradigm have illuminated many fundamental features about how differences in Notch signaling between equivalent cells arise and are amplified during a cell fate decision. During the AC/VU decision, Z1.ppp and Z4.aaa initially express both LIN-12/Notch and its ligand LAG-2; a stochastic small difference in ligand or receptor activity is amplified by feedback mechanisms that restrict transcription of
lin-12 to the presumptive VU cell and
lag-2 to the presumptive AC cell. The AC/VU decision is random, as 50% of animals have an AC derived from Z1.ppp and 50% have an AC derived from Z4.aaa. However, the first-born of these cells is biased towards the VU fate (Karp and Greenwald, 2003), suggesting that stochasticity in birth order or a process correlated with birth order is at play. A recent advance in microfluidic technology for imaging C. elegans larvae (Keil et al., 2017) has allowed us, for the first time, to image dozens of somatic gonad lineages and to probe the relationship between lineage patterns, birth-order, and cell fate specification in the AC/VU decision. We fluorescently labeled Z1, Z4, and their descendants, followed Z1 and Z4 lineages at 8-min intervals through their three rounds of division and somatic primordium formation, and observed how the timing of cell divisions in the Z1 and Z4 lineages correlates with the AC/VU decision. We find that Z1.ppp and Z4.aaa birth-order differences generally reflect accumulating birth order differences higher up in each respective lineage. Importantly, we find that at 20 deg C, when the birth-order difference between Z1.ppp and Z4.aaa is longer than 16 minutes, the first-born cell always becomes the VU (n=19). When the birth-order difference between Z1.ppp and Z4.aaa is less than or equal to 16 minutes, birth-order no longer biases cell fate (n=24). Thus, above a threshold in birth-order time difference, the AC/VU decision becomes predictable. We are currently investigating how birth-order controls the AC/VU decision, testing specifically whether birth-order bias is affected by environmental conditions. We hypothesize that the stochastic pattern of cell divisions in the Z1 and Z4 lineages contributes to robustness in the AC/VU decision.