- WBPaper00031903:prg-1_regulated
The fold differences from the three experiments were averaged, and a Z test [Z = (observed - expected) / SE] was performed. Genes with up- or downregulation greater than 1.5-fold, p < 0.05, in any given mutant were selected for inclusion.
Genes with differential expression in prg-1(tm872) male gonads comparing to N2.
- WBPaper00038168:lin-35_downregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were downregulated in lin-35.
- WBPaper00038168:lin-35_upregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were upregulated in lin-35.
- WBPaper00038168:lin-15B(n744)_downregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were downregulated in lin-15B(n744).
- WBPaper00038168:lin-15B(n744)_upregulated
For each gene in each microarray hybridization experiment, the ratio of RNA levels from the two samples was transformed into a log2 value and the mean log2 ratio was calculated. The log2 ratios were normalized by print-tip Loess normalization (Dudoit and Yang, 2002). All genes with a false discovery rate of <= 5% (q <= 0.05) (Storey and Tibshirani, 2003) and a mean fold-change ratio of >= 1.5 were selected for further analysis.
Genes that were upregulated in lin-15B(n744).
- WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_downregulated
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical.
miRNAs that showed decreased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2.
- WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day1_upregulated
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical.
miRNAs that showed increased expression in 1 day post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2.
- WBPaper00046156:eat-2(ad1116)_Day8_upregulated
A fold change >= 1.5 with a minimum read count of >= 10 were used to filter the differentially expressed miRNA. The p-value cutoff was set at p <= 0.05 based on Kals Z test statistical.
miRNAs that showed increased expression in 8 days post L4 adult hermaphrodite eat-2(ad1116) comparing to in N2.
- WBPaper00027758:Group_I
For each set of mutant data, the repeats were averaged, and a Z test [Z=(observedexpected)\/SE] was performed in Excel. A moderate correction for multiple testing (~17,600 genes) was performed by multiplying the calculated P-value by 10,000. After this correction, all genes with up- or downregulation greater than twofold, P<0.05 in any given mutant were selected. The hypergeometric probability test was used to calculate the significance of overlap of gene groups. Authors determined whether transcripts of Group I-IV genes are bound by GLD-1, based on a minimum criteria of >1.5 enrichment in GLD-1 immunoprecipitated samples compared to control immunoprecipitations (P < 0.01).
Genes downregulated in dpl-1(n3316) and efl-1(n3639) mutants.
- WBPaper00027758:Group_III
For each set of mutant data, the repeats were averaged, and a Z test [Z=(observedexpected)\/SE] was performed in Excel. A moderate correction for multiple testing (~17,600 genes) was performed by multiplying the calculated P-value by 10,000. After this correction, all genes with up- or downregulation greater than twofold, P<0.05 in any given mutant were selected. The hypergeometric probability test was used to calculate the significance of overlap of gene groups. Authors determined whether transcripts of Group I-IV genes are bound by GLD-1, based on a minimum criteria of >1.5 enrichment in GLD-1 immunoprecipitated samples compared to control immunoprecipitations (P < 0.01).
Genes with higher expression in one or more mutants of efl-1, dpl-1 and lin-35 relative to controls.